Big Bang Titanic: New Dark Energy (Vacuum Gravity) Cosmic Model Emerges Upon Falsification of The Big Bang By Disproof of Its Central Assumptions

Physicists who identify the big bang with the early universe should have first noted from Hawking's \textit{A Brief History of Time}, p. 42, that he ties Hubble's law to Doppler shifts from galaxy recession from a nearby center, not to bb's unvalidated and thus problematical expansion redshifts. Our PRL submission LJ12135 describes such a model, but in it Hubble's law is due to Doppler and vacuum gravity effects, the 2.73K CBR is vacuum gravity shifted blackbody cavity radiation from an outer galactic shell, and its (1 + z)$^{-1}$ dilation and (M,z) relations closely fit high-z SNe Ia data; all this strongly implies our model's vacuum energy\textit{ is} the elusive dark energy. We also find GPS operation's GR effects falsify big bang's in-flight expansion redshift paradigm, and hence the big bang, by showing $\lambda $ changes occur only at emission. Surprisingly we also discover big bang's CBR prediction is T $<$ 2$\times $10$^{-8}$ K, not the observed 2.73K. So instead of the 2.73K affirming the big bang as cosmologists claim, it actually disproves it, to which the DAE's response is most enigmatic -- namely, \underline {CBR photons} expand d$\lambda $/dt $>$ 0, while \underline {galactic photons} \underline {shrink} d$\lambda $/dt $<$ 0. Contrary to a PRL editor's claim, the above results show LJ12135 fits PRL guidelines for papers that replace established theories. For details see \underline {alphacosmos.net.}