The Big Bang, Genesis, and Knocking on Heaven's Door

Michael Shermer recently upped the ante in the big bang-Genesis controversy by citing Lisa Randall's provocative claim (Science 334, 762 (2011)) \textit{that ``it is inconceivable that God could continue to intervene without introducing a material trace of his actions.''} So does Randall's and Shermer's agreement that no such evidence exists disprove God's existence? Not in my view because my 1970s \textit{Science}, \textit{Nature }and \textit{ARNS }publications, and my article in the 1982 AAAS Western Division's Symposium Proceedings, \textit{Evolution Confronts Creation, } all contain validation of God's existence via discovery of His Fingerprints of Creation and falsification of the big bang and geological evolution. These results came to wide public/scientific attention in my testimony at the 1981 Arkansas creation/evolution trial. There ACLU witness G Brent Dalrymple from the USGS -- and 2005 Medal of Science recipient from President Bush -- admitted I had discovered a tiny mystery (primordial polonium radiohalos) in granite rocks that indicated their almost instant creation. As a follow-up in 1992 and 1995 he sent out SOS letters to the entire AGU membership that the polonium halo evidence for fiat creation still existed and that someone needed to urgently find a naturalistic explanation for them. Is the physics community guilty of a Watergate-type cover-up of this discovery of God's existence and falsification of the big bang? For the answer see www.halos.tv.