Machine Learning flow control in the few sensors limit

ORAL

Abstract

A comparative assessment of machine learning (ML) methods for closed-loop wake control in configurations with a limited number of sensors is presented. The baseline flow field is a two-dimensional simulation of the Kármán vortex street past a cylinder at moderate Reynolds number (Re=100). The actuation is performed by two jets on the sides of a cylinder. The flow is monitored with several sensor probe arrangements including 5, 11 and 151 velocity signals and one case with lift and drag sensors. Two popular alternatives are evaluated: Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) as pioneered by Rabault et al. (2019, JFM) and Genetic Programming control (GPC) for tree-based, linear and gradient-enriched realizations as pursued by the authors. All machine learning control methods successfully stabilize the vortex shedding and effectively reduce drag while using small mass flow rates for the actuation. DRL and GPC have complementary strengths. DRL yields higher drag reductions for large numbers of probes and short training periods. In contrast, GPC performs better for cases with fewer sensors and longer training periods. The results hint at combinations of DRL and GPC for further performance improvements.

*Work produced with the support of a 2020 Leonardo Grant for Researchers and Cultural Creators, BBVA Foundation, grant n. IN[20]_ING_ING_0163. The Foundation takes no responsibility for the opinions, statements and contents of this project, which are entirely the responsibility of its authors.

Presenters

  • Rodrigo Castellanos

    • Aerospace Engineering Research Group, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganes, Spain

Authors

  • Rodrigo Castellanos

    • Aerospace Engineering Research Group, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganes, Spain
  • Ignacio de la Fuente

    • Aerospace Engineering Research Group, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganes, Spain
  • Guy Y Cornejo Maceda

    • CNRS, Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire des Sciences du Numérique, Université Paris-Saclay, 91400 Orsay, France
  • Bernd R Noack

    • School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, China
  • Andrea Ianiro

    • Aerospace Engineering Research Group, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganes, Spain
    • Carlos III University
  • Stefano Discetti

    • Aerospace Engineering Research Group, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganes, Spain
    • Carlos III University