\textbf{Pulse Designs Varying Hot-Electron Production for Direct-Drive Inertial Confinement Fusion Implosions OMEGA Utilizing the SG5-650 Phase Plates}
ORAL
Abstract
New ``SG5-650'' phase plates ($R_{\mathrm{95}}$~$=$~325 $\mu $m) to complement the ``SG5-850's'' (R$_{\mathrm{95}}$~$=$~425~$\mu $m) have been fielded on OMEGA. The SG5-650 phase plates allow for the reduction of cross-beam energy transfer (CBET) effects by decreasing the R$_{\mathrm{beam}}$/R$_{\mathrm{target}}$. However, preheating from increased hot-electron production can occur as the net overlapped intensity increases. To experimentally evaluate this trade-off's impact on cryogenic implosion performance, pulse shapes were designed that gave approximately equal 1-D performance but the main drive power history was adjusted to provide different quarter-critical intensity levels and therefore different levels of hot-electron production. Hot-electron production levels were experimentally verified by using the hard x-ray diagnostic when shooting the pulses on warm plastic targets. In a future experiment utilizing the SG5-650 phase plates, an intensity scan will be used to study the effect of preheating on a 0.8x hydro scale of the best-performing implosion that utilized the SG5-850 phase plates.
*This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration under Award Number Abstract DE-NA0003856
–
Authors
D. Cao
University of Rochester
University of Rochester - LLE
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester
Laboratory for Laser Energetics
D. Patel
University of Rochester - LLE
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester
Laboratory for Laser Energetics
University of Rochester
M.J. Rosenberg
U. of Rochester's Laboratory for Laser Energetics
LLE
University of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester
Laboratory for Laser Energetics
University of Rochester
Wolfgang Theobald
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester
Laboratory for Laser Energetics
University of Rochester
Laboratory of Laser Energetics
C. Thomas
LLE
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester
University of Rochester
A.R. Christopherson
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester
Laboratory for Laser Energetics
University of Rochester
C. Stoeckl
University of Rochester
University of Rochester - LLE
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester
Laboratory for Laser Energetics
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester
University of Rochester, NY 14623, USA
Sean Regan
LLE
University of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics
University of Rochester - LLE
University of Rochester
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester
Laboratory for Laser Energetics
I.V. Igumenshchev
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester
Laboratory for Laser Energetics
University of Rochester
Riccrado Betti
University of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics
University of Rochester
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester
Laboratory for Laser Energetics
Radha Bahukutumbi
LLE
University of Rochester
University of Rochester - LLE
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester
Laboratory for laser Energetics, University of Rochester
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester
Laboratory for Laser Energetics
V. N. Goncharov
Laboratory for Laser Energetics
University of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics
University of Rochester - LLE
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester
University of Rochester
Laboratory for laser Energetics, University of Rochester