Machine learning-based preemptive RMP control for ELM-crash suppression in KSTAR plasmas

ORAL

Abstract

The ELM-crash suppression is a critical issue to ITER in that even a single ELM crash can severely reduce the lifetime of the plasma-facing components. The L-H transition and the onset of the ELMing occur within a somewhat predictable range but at an arbitrary moment that is difficult to know precisely. Due to such characteristics of the H-mode, the ELM-less H-mode can be achieved by automation of preemptive and event-driven control rather than feedforward approaches. Our innovative way [1] for the preemptive control is to apply RMP in the pedestal build-up period at low βN using a real-time machine learning algorithm. As a result, we can avoid the screening of RMP from the strong ExB and electron diamagnetic flow as expected from a fully developed H-mode pedestal at high βN. Furthermore, after applying RMP to the pedestal build-up period, the pedestal width is wider than the conventional RMP-ELM suppression discharges, while the gradient in the core region is relatively steep and high. Therefore, the shots sustain plasma performance steadily without rapid performance collapse or steady performance degradation except for the RMP effect.

[1] Giwook Shin et al., “Real-time classification of L-H transition and ELM in KSTAR”, Fusion Engineering and Design 157 (2020) 111634

*This research was supported by R&D Program of "KSTAR Experimental Collaboration and Fusion Plasma Research (EN2101-12)" and "Study on the Realtime Control of Nuclear Fusion Plasma Edge- Localized Mode by 3D Magnetic Field (PI2002)" through the Korea Institute of Fusion Energy(KFE) funded by the Government funds and by the Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., LTD (KHNP) under 2019-Tech-G19IO16.

Presenters

  • G. Shin

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE)
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

Authors

  • G. Shin

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE)
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • H. S. Hahn

    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE)
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • Minwoo Kim

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE)
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • Sang-hee Hahn

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE)
    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Daejeon, Korea
  • Wonha Ko

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • Korea Institute for Fusion Energy
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE)
  • Gunyoung Park

    • Korea Institute for Fusion Energy
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE)
  • Myungwon Lee

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE)
  • Youngho Lee

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE)
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Daejeon, Korea
  • Minho H Kim

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE)
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • Jaewook Kim

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Daejeon, Korea
    • Korea institute of Fusion Energy
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE)
  • Junewoo Juhn

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE)
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • Juhyeok Jang

    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Daejeon, Korea
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE)
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • H.S. Kim

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE)
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • Jongha Lee

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE)
    • KFE
  • Hajin Kim

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE)
  • Si-Woo Yoon

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE)
    • KFE