Kinetic Ballooning Modes in Wendelstein 7-X high-performance experiments

ORAL

Abstract

Wendelstein 7-X stellarator (W7-X) aims to demonstrate steady state operation at high β (ratio of kinetic to magnetic pressure) values. This implies high plasma densities up to 2.1020 m-3 since the confinement scales beneficially with the density. In recent W7-X experiments, injection of hydrogen pellets was successfully applied for core fuelling [1]. The realization of such densities is complicated due to a limited control of the profile shape. During high-β phases of these discharges MHD-like events were observed, which may indicate a stability limit. In addition, linear GENE simulations suggest that the density and temperature gradients in that phases were large enough to destabilise kinetic ballooning modes (KBMs). Although these plasmas are stable to ideal-MHD instabilities, including ballooning modes, gyrokinetic effects on the latter render them unstable.

The possibility of KBMs limiting the performance motivates an extensive study of different W7-X configurations with regard to, first, electromagnetic modifications of microinstabilities and the so-called “stability valley”, and, second, the connection between global MHD configuration properties and local gyrokinetic stability. In particular, we consider the effects of the vacuum rotational transform, ι, and the mirror ratio.

[1] Bozhenkov, S., et al. Nuclear Fusion 60.6 (2020): 066011.

Presenters

  • Ksenia Aleynikova

    • IPP Max Planck, Greifswald
    • Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, Greifswald, Germany; Max Planck/Princeton Research Center for Plasma Physics

Authors

  • Ksenia Aleynikova

    • IPP Max Planck, Greifswald
    • Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, Greifswald, Germany; Max Planck/Princeton Research Center for Plasma Physics
  • Christian Brandt

    • Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, Greifswald, Germany
  • Alessandro Zocco

    • Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, Greifswald, Germany
  • Carolin Nuehrenberg

    • Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, Greifswald, Germany
  • Adrian von Stechow

    • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics
    • Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, Greifswald, Germany
  • Joachim Geiger

    • Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Greifswald
    • Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, Greifswald, Germany
  • Golo Fuchert

    • Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, Greifswald, Germany
  • Novimir A Pablant

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
    • PPPL
    • PPPL, Princeton University, P.O. Box 451, Princeton, New Jersey 08543, USA
  • Kian Rahbarnia

    • Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Greifswald
    • Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, Greifswald, Germany
  • Henning Thomsen

    • Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Greifswald
    • Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, Greifswald, Germany
  • Paul Mulholland

    • Science and Technology of Nuclear Fusion, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
  • M.J. Pueschel

    • Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research
    • Science and Technology of Nuclear Fusion, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB; Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research, 5612 AJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
  • Josefine Proll

    • Science and Technology of Nuclear Fusion, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands