Overview of Disruption Event Characterization and Forecasting (DECAF) Research

POSTER

Abstract

Physics-based disruption event characterization and forecasting (DECAF) research determines the relation of events leading to plasma disruption and aims to provide early warning for disruption avoidance. Offline analysis accesses data from several tokamaks (e.g. KSTAR, MAST/-U, NSTX/-U, ASDEX-U, DIII-D) to best understand, validate, and extrapolate models and to consider the key question of event and disruption correlation vs. causality. Fully automated analysis of large datasets is possible with initial results showing true positive rates over 99%. Real-time (r/t) DECAF has started on KSTAR. Experiments produced over 50 plasmas that are forecast with 100% accuracy in r/t, some triggering controlled plasma shutdown or disruption mitigation. Warnings were issued well before (>0.5s) the expected disruption. R/t magnetics, Te profiles from electron cyclotron emission (ECE), 2D Te fluctuation data from ECE imaging, and velocity profile acquisition are installed. An r/t MSE system has been built. Research supporting DECAF is shown including resistive stability evaluation at high non-inductive current fraction and innovative counterfactual machine learning application to MHD stability limits. *This research is supported by U.S. DOE grants DE-SC0020415, DE-SC0018623, and DE-SC0021311.

Presenters

  • Steven A Sabbagh

    • Columbia University
    • Columbia U.
    • Columbia Uni.

Authors

  • Steven A Sabbagh

    • Columbia University
    • Columbia U.
    • Columbia Uni.
  • Young-Seok Park

    • Columbia University
    • Columbia U.
    • Columbia University, U.S.A.
    • Columbia Uni.
    • Columbia Univ
  • Juan D Riquezes

    • Columbia University
  • John Berkery

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
    • Columbia U.
    • PPPL
  • Jalal Butt

    • Columbia University
  • Matthew Tobin

    • Columbia University
    • Columbia U.
  • Veronika Zamkovska

    • Columbia University
  • Jun Gyo Bak

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • Korea institute of Fusion Energy
    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea
  • M. J. Choi

    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea
  • Hyunsun Han

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea
  • Jayhyun Kim

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • KFE
  • Woong Chae Kim

    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • Jinseok Ko

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea
  • Won-Ha Ko

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • KFE
    • Natl Fusion Res Inst
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea
  • Jongha Lee

    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea
  • Jeongwon Lee

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • KFE
  • Si-Woo Yoon

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea
  • Mark D Boyer

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
    • PPPL
  • Keith Erickson

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
    • PPPL
  • Mario L Podesta

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
  • Jongsoo Yoo

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
  • Fred M Levinton

    • Nova Photonics
  • Matt Galante

    • Nova Photonics
  • Christopher Ham

    • CCFE
  • Sam Gibson

    • CCFE
    • UKAEA
  • Andrew Kirk

    • Culham Centre for Fusion Energy
    • CCFE
  • Lucy Kogan

    • CCFE Culham Science Centre
    • CCFE
    • UKAEA
  • David Ryan

    • CCFE
    • UKAEA
  • Andrew J Thornton

    • United Kingdom Atomic Energy Agency
    • CCFE
  • Andrea Piccione

    • University College London
  • Yiannis Andreopoulos

    • University College London