Transport and stability in sustained high q<sub>min</sub>, high β<sub>N</sub> discharges on DIII-D

ORAL

Abstract

To address the needs for a fusion pilot plan design, DIII-D/EAST joint experiments on DIII-D have demonstrated high normalized beta βN>4, poloidal beta βP>3, toroidal beta βT>3% with qmin>2, q95≤8 sustained for more than six energy confinement times. The excellent energy confinement quality (H98y2~1.7) is achieved with an internal transport barrier (ITB) at high line-averaged Greenwald density fraction, fGW>0.9 (~7×1019 m-3). Gyrofluid (TGLF) modeling of the transport characteristics shows that the beam driven rotation does not play an important role in the high confinement quality. This is consistent with the paradigm that turbulent transport within the ITB region is suppressed by strong alpha-stabilization effect at high βP. The high performance phase can be terminated by fast growing modes triggered near the n=1 ideal-wall kink stability limit by large edge localized modes (ELMs). While the achieved bootstrap current fraction on DIII-D is high (up to 80%), it will be even higher in a reactor at the same βN, q95 and fGW due to the lower collisionality from higher BT and IP. Future experiments will aim to make up the difference in bootstrap current and achieve fully noninductive conditions by using helicon and top launch EC wave injection for additional, efficient off-axis current drive at high density and beta.

*Work supported by US DOE under DE-FC02-04ER54698 and DE-SC0010685, National Natural Science Foundation of China under 11975276, Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation No. 2008085J04, National Key Research and Development Program of China No. 2019YFE03020004, Anhui Provincial Key R&D Programmes No. 202104b11020003 and the Excellence Program of Hefei Science Center CAS No. 2021HSC-UE015.

Presenters

  • Juan Huang

    • EAST Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, People's Republic of China
    • Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Authors

  • Juan Huang

    • EAST Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, People's Republic of China
    • Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Andrea M Garofalo

    • General Atomics - San Diego
    • General Atomics
  • Wilkie Choi

    • General Atomics - San Diego
  • Xi Chen

    • General Atomics
  • Colin Chrystal

    • General Atomics - San Diego
  • Siye Ding

    • 3General Atomics, P.O. Box 85608, San Diego, California, 92186-5608, USA
    • Oak Ridge Assoc Univ
  • Xianzu Gong

    • EAST Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, People's Republic of China
    • Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China
  • Qiming Hu

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
    • PPPL
  • Rongjie Hong

    • UCLA
    • University of California, Los Angeles
  • Christopher T Holcomb

    • Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab
    • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
  • Xiang Jian

    • General Atomics
    • University of California, San Diego
  • John Lohr

    • General Atomics - San Diego
    • General Atomics
  • Jinping Qian

    • EAST Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, People's Republic of China
    • Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
    • ASIPP
  • Terry L Rhodes

    • University of California, Los Angeles
    • UCLA
  • Qilong Ren

    • ASIPP
  • Ted J Strait

    • General Atomics
    • General Atomics - San Diego
    • GA
  • PengJun Sun

    • ASIPP
  • Yanxu Sun

    • ASIPP
  • Huiqian Wang

    • General Atomics - San Diego
    • General Atomics
  • Liang Wang

    • Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Zheng Yan

    • University of Wisconsin - Madison
    • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Xinjun Zhang

    • ASIPP