Disruption Event Characterization and Forecasting Research and First Real-time Application on KSTAR

ORAL

Abstract

Disruption prediction and avoidance is critical for ITER and reactor-scale tokamaks to maintain steady plasma operation and to avoid damage to device components. Physics-based disruption event characterization and forecasting (DECAF) research determines the relation of events leading to disruption and aims to provide event onset forecasts with high accuracy and early warning for disruption avoidance. Real-time application of DECAF was recently made on the KSTAR superconducting tokamak. Experiments focused on locking MHD instabilities produced 40 plasmas with nearly equal disrupted / non-disrupted cases that are forecast with 100% accuracy. These real-time forecasts triggered controlled plasma shutdown and disruption mitigation. The warnings were issued well before the expected plasma disruption time and early warning guidance given for ITER disruption mitigation. Offline analysis has access to data from several tokamaks (e.g. KSTAR, MAST, NSTX) to best understand, validate, and extrapolate models. Recent code improvements allow fully automated analysis of up to entire device databases. Such initial analysis shows very high true positive success rates over 99%. *This research is supported by the U.S. DOE under grants DE-SC0020415, DE-SC0018623, and DE-SC0021311.

Presenters

  • Steven A Sabbagh

    • Columbia University
    • Columbia U.
    • Columbia Uni.

Authors

  • Steven A Sabbagh

    • Columbia University
    • Columbia U.
    • Columbia Uni.
  • Young-Seok Park

    • Columbia University
    • Columbia U.
    • Columbia University, U.S.A.
    • Columbia Uni.
    • Columbia Univ
  • Juan D Riquezes

    • Columbia University
  • John Berkery

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
    • Columbia U.
    • PPPL
  • Jalal Butt

    • Columbia University
  • Matthew Tobin

    • Columbia University
    • Columbia U.
  • Veronika Zamkovska

    • Columbia University
  • Jun Gyo Bak

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • Korea institute of Fusion Energy
    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea
  • M. J. Choi

    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea
  • Hyunsun Han

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea
  • Jayhyun Kim

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • KFE
  • Woong Chae Kim

    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • Jinseok Ko

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea
  • Won-Ha Ko

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • KFE
    • Natl Fusion Res Inst
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea
  • Jongha Lee

    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea
  • Jeongwon Lee

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • KFE
  • K. D Lee

    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea
  • Si-Woo Yoon

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea
  • Mark D Boyer

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
    • PPPL
  • Keith Erickson

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
    • PPPL
  • Mario L Podesta

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
  • Jongsoo Yoo

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
  • Fred M Levinton

    • Nova Photonics
  • Matt Galante

    • Nova Photonics
  • Christopher Ham

    • CCFE
  • Sam Gibson

    • CCFE
    • UKAEA
  • Andrew Kirk

    • Culham Centre for Fusion Energy
    • CCFE
  • Lucy Kogan

    • CCFE Culham Science Centre
    • CCFE
    • UKAEA
  • David Ryan

    • CCFE
    • UKAEA
  • Andrew J Thornton

    • United Kingdom Atomic Energy Agency
    • CCFE
  • Andrea Piccione

    • University College London
  • Yiannis Andreopoulos

    • University College London