Evolution of the SPARC divertor design: engineering and physics trade-offs

POSTER

Abstract

SPARC is a compact, high-field tokamak (B0 = 12.2 T, R0 = 1.85 m) with a close-fitting tungsten first wall. The resulting thermal and structural loads are challenging for the engineering design. Divertor targets will need to survive 10s pulses with unmitigated divertor parallel heat fluxes of ∽10 GW/m2; while disruptions can drive ∽2 kT/s changing magnetic fields, leading to large eddy current structural loads. Nonetheless, it is important that the divertor has sufficient diagnostic access and shaping to ensure that the SPARC divertor mission can be executed – exploration of highly dissipative, low erosion regimes, with neutral pumping for projections to next step devices. The present SPARC divertor is up-down symmetric, with both horizontal and vertical target plate configurations on the inner and outer divertors. In addition, the outer divertors feature highly baffled long legs (Lpol∽0.5 m, Rtarget/Rxpt∽1.2) and can form a X-point target divertor. The trade-offs between the engineering and physics requirements have driven the evolution of the divertor design from a beam-dump to the present SPARC divertor. These driving factors will be presented alongside the details of the SPARC divertor design.

*Work supported by Commonwealth Fusion Systems RPP022, RPP030, and INFUSE 2021.

Presenters

  • Adam Q Kuang

    • MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
    • MIT PSFC
    • MIT Plasma Science Fusion Center

Authors

  • Adam Q Kuang

    • MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
    • MIT PSFC
    • MIT Plasma Science Fusion Center
  • Matthew L Reinke

    • Commonwealth Fusion Systems
    • CFS
  • Sean B Ballinger

    • MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
    • MIT-PSFC
    • MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Centre
  • John Canik

    • Oak Ridge National Lab
  • Robert S Granetz

    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology MI
    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    • MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
    • MIT
  • Trey Henderson

    • Commonwealth Fusion Systems
  • Matthew Honickman

    • Commonwealth Fusion Systems
  • Michael Lagieski

    • Commonwealth Fusion Systems
  • Bruce Lipschultz

    • University of York
    • The University of York
  • Jeremy D Lore

    • Oak Ridge National Lab
  • Valeria Riccardo

    • Commonwealth Fusion Systems
  • Ryan M Sweeney

    • MIT PSFC
    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    • MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
  • Michael Wigram

    • MIT PSFC
    • MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT
  • Dina Yuryez

    • Commonwealth Fusion Systems