Integration of RMP ELM control with divertor detachment in the DIII-D tokamak

ORAL  · Invited

Abstract

Dedicated experiments in the DIII-D tokamak have been performed to explore the compatibility of ELM control by n=3 resonant magnetic perturbations (RMPs) with divertor detachment seeded by impurities in the closed divertor configuration. Simultaneous RMP ELM mitigation and divertor detachment have been achieved in the DIII-D ITER-similar shape plasma with H98y2~1.2, q95~3.5, βN~2, energy loss per ELM decreased from 5% to 0.5%, and the peak heat flux decreased by 6 and 4 times during the intra- and inter-ELM respectively. In contrast to low collisionality plasma, during high collisionality detachment, n=3 RMP with up-down phase difference of △ΦUL=180° is found to produce stronger magnetic response at the pedestal-top and cause stronger ELM mitigation than for △ΦUL=0. The RMP is first found to facilitate divertor detachment by decreasing the detachment onset line-averaged density by up to 30% but increasing the scrape-off layer density by up to 80%. This is consistent with predictions for ITER but opposite to open divertor results where the RMP increases the divertor detachment density. Lobe structures are consistently observed during attached and detached conditions from line radiation imaging. They are found to enhance particle transport and result in higher upstream density in the near-SOL region based on EMC3-Eirene simulations. Linear calculations by GPEC show that the magnetic response to the RMP decreases by up to 70% during detachment due to the strongly degraded pedestal bootstrap current and the resulting weaker edge kink response. Analysis indicates that full RMP ELM suppression with divertor detachment is challenging for DIII-D due to the decreased plasma response in high collisionality plasmas, but it is predicted to be less challenging for ITER where detachment will be achieved with low pedestal collisionality.

*This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number(s) DE-AC02-09CH11466, DE-FC02-04ER54698, DE-SC0020357, DE-AC52-07NA27344, DE-AC05-00OR22725, DE-SC0022270, DE-SC0014264.

Presenters

  • Qiming Hu

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

Authors

  • Qiming Hu

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
  • Huiqian Wang

    • General Atomics
    • General Atomics - San Diego
  • David Eldon

    • General Atomics - San Diego
    • General Atomics
  • Shuai Gu

    • Oak Ridge Associated Universities
  • Heinke G Frerichs

    • University of Wisconsin - Madison
  • Filippo Scotti

    • Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab
  • Robert S Wilcox

    • Oak Ridge National Laboratory
    • Oak Ridge National Lab
  • Alessandro Bortolon

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
    • PPPL
  • Lennard Ceelen

    • DIFFER
    • Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research, Eindhoven
  • Florian Effenberg

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
  • SangKyeun Kim

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
    • Princeton University
  • Charlie Lasnier

    • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
    • LLNL
    • Lawrence Livermore National Lab
  • Anthony W Leonard

    • General Atomics - San Diego
    • General Atomics DIII-D
    • General Atomics
  • Nikolas C Logan

    • Columbia University
    • Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab
  • Auna L Moser

    • General Atomics - San Diego
  • Tom H Osborne

    • General Atomics
    • General Atomics - San Diego
  • Carlos A Paz-Soldan

    • Columbia University
  • Morgan W Shafer

    • Oak Ridge National Laboratory
  • Theresa M Wilks

    • MIT-PSFC
    • MIT
  • SeongMoo Yang

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory