Overview of High Accuracy, Multi-device Disruption Event Characterization and Forecasting (DECAF) Research

POSTER

Abstract

Physics-based disruption event characterization and forecasting (DECAF) research [1] determines the proximity of tokamak plasma states to a critical disruption warning level providing early forecasts for disruption avoidance or to cue mitigation. Offline analysis accesses the full databases of several tokamaks (e.g. KSTAR, MAST/-U, NSTX/-U, ASDEX-U, DIII-D, ST-40) providing understanding, validation, and extrapolation of models for future devices. Fully automated analysis of large datasets is possible with results showing true positive rates over 99%. Analysis of vertical displacement events shows high prediction accuracy: true positive/negative rates of 61.7% / 38.0% - a combined true accuracy rate of 99.7%. Density limit investigations show that plasmas disrupt after crossing microinstability limits [2] before reaching the Greenwald limit. Real-time (r/t) DECAF experiments on KSTAR produced over 50 plasmas forecast with 100% accuracy in r/t, some triggering controlled plasma shutdown, disruption mitigation, or avoidance actuators. Warnings were issued well before (~1.0s) the expected disruption. R/t magnetics, Te profiles from electron cyclotron emission (ECE), 2D Te fluctuation data from ECE imaging, and velocity profile acquisition are installed, with MSE to follow.

[1] S.A. Sabbagh, et al., Phys. Plasmas 30 (2023) 032506; https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0133825

[2] M. Bernet, et al., PPCF 57 (2015) 014038; M. Giacomin, et al., PRL 128 (2022) 185003

*Supported by U.S. DOE grants DE-SC0020415, DE-SC0021311, and DE-SC0018623.

Presenters

  • Steven A Sabbagh

    • Columbia University
    • Columbia U.
    • Columbia U. / PPPL

Authors

  • Steven A Sabbagh

    • Columbia University
    • Columbia U.
    • Columbia U. / PPPL
  • Young-Seok Park

    • Columbia Univ
    • Columbia University
  • Juan D Riquezes

    • Columbia University
  • Matthew Tobin

    • Columbia U.
    • Columbia University
  • Veronika Zamkovska

    • Columbia University
  • Guillermo B Bustos-Ramirez

    • Columbia University
  • Grant A Tillinghast

    • Columbia U.
  • Frederick Sheehan

    • Columbia U.
  • J. G. Bak

    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • M. J. Choi

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • KFE
  • Hyunsun Han

    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • Korean Institute of Fusion Energy
  • Jayhyun Kim

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • KFE
    • National Fusion Research Institute
  • Woong Chae Kim

    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • J.S. Ko

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • KFE
  • Won Ha Ko

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • KFE
    • Korean Institute of Fusion Energy
  • Jongha Lee

    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • Jeongwon Lee

    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • Kyu-Dong Lee

    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • S.W. Yoon

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • KFE
  • Jack Berkery

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
  • Keith Erickson

    • PPPL
    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
  • Mario L Podesta

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
    • PPPL
  • Jongsoo Yoo

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
  • Fred M Levinton

    • Nova Photonics, Inc.
    • Nova Photonics Inc.
    • Nova Photonics
  • Matthew E Galante

    • Nova Photonics, Inc.
    • Nova Photonics Inc.
  • Christopher Ham

    • Culham Center for Fusion Energy
    • UKAEA
    • CCFE
  • Sam Gibson

    • UKAEA
    • United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority, Culham, UK
  • David Ryan

    • UKAEA
    • United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority, Culham, UK
  • Andrew J Thornton

    • United Kingdom Atomic Energy Agency
    • UKAEA