DECAF multi-device database analysis of an MHD mode locking forecaster with real-time application

POSTER

Abstract

Tokamak reactors require low disruptivity to support commercial viability. An important precursor to disruptions is the locking dynamic of rotating MHD events that are often neoclassical tearing modes (NTM). The drag of electromagnetic and fluid viscosity torques can cause the slowing down of NTM's and lock them to the device conducting structure. A balance of the driving torque from the NBI, and drag from perpendicular viscous diffusion drag, and electromagnetic forces on the mode, as well as its inertia, are used to model the mode rotation dynamics. Prediction, observation, and avoidance of these modes are, therefore, essential in the operation of tokamaks. A mode locking forecaster based on the torque balance model has been developed across devices of ranging aspect ratio and error fields. A real-time application of the model in the KSTAR tokamak was able to achieve 100% accuracy in forecasting for a set of 50 shots of varying scenarios. Analysis of the KSTAR, NSTX, MAST-U, and DIII-D databases is conducted, and differences in performance of the forecaster are compared. Explanations are given for variation in performance and possible solutions to achieve higher accuracy given

*This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under grants DE-SC0020415, DE-SC0021311, and DE-SC0018623.

Presenters

  • Juan D Riquezes

    • Columbia University

Authors

  • Juan D Riquezes

    • Columbia University
  • Steven A Sabbagh

    • Columbia University
    • Columbia U.
    • Columbia U. / PPPL
  • Jack Berkery

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
  • Young-Seok Park

    • Columbia Univ
    • Columbia University
  • Veronika Zamkovska

    • Columbia University
  • Jalal Butt

    • Princeton University
  • Matthew Tobin

    • Columbia University
  • J. G. Bak

    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • Jayhyun Kim

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • KFE
    • National Fusion Research Institute
  • Keith Erickson

    • PPPL
    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
  • S.W. Yoon

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • KFE
  • Guillermo B Bustos-Ramirez

    • Columbia University
  • Guillermo B Bustos-Ramirez

    • Columbia University