Q > 1 operation space in the first SPARC campaign

ORAL

Abstract

Q > 1 is predicted to be achieved on SPARC with L-mode confinement scaling assumptions, Ip ~ 8.5 MA, and BT = 12.2T, producing more than 8 MW of D:T fusion power for at least two seconds. L-mode Q > 1 operation space exists at volume average densities in the range of 1 - 3 x 1020 m-3 (fG = 0.12 - 0.36) where the lowest densities are near the expected LOC-SOC confinement transition. Probabilistic analysis of error field sources quantifies a < 1% chance that access to low density will be restricted by locked-modes. Reduced models of the ICRH heating provide fast estimates of the RF coupling and operation limit at low density. The core and boundary impurity species and concentrations are set by the requirements to radiate sufficient power to reach strike point temperatures, ~40 eV, that do not exceed prior empirical demonstrations while also maintaining Zeff < 3 as required by the ohmic flux consumption rate and minimizing the dilution of the main ions. Elevating the L-mode confinement scaling expectation by 20% results in achieving Q > 1 over a wide operational window, while reducing it by 20% makes Q > 1 unlikely in L-mode. Recent L-mode energy and particle transport predictions for SPARC help quantify the likelihood of success for the Q > 1 mission with L-mode scenarios.

*Work supported by Commonwealth Fusion Systems

Presenters

  • Devon J Battaglia

    • Commonwealth Fusion Systems

Authors

  • Devon J Battaglia

    • Commonwealth Fusion Systems
  • Thomas A Body

    • Commonwealth Fusion Systems
  • Michael W Brookman

    • Commonwealth Fusion Systems
  • Alexander J Creely

    • Commonwealth Fusion Systems
  • Thomas Eich

    • Commonwealth Fusion Systems
  • Christoph Hasse

    • Commonwealth Fusion Systems
  • Clayton E Myers

    • Commonwealth Fusion Systems
  • Matthew L Reinke

    • Commonwealth Fusion Systems
    • CFS
  • steven D scott

    • Commonwealth Fusion Systems
  • Ryan M Sweeney

    • Commonwealth Fusion Systems
    • CFS
    • MIT PSFC
    • Commonwealth Fusion System
  • Nathan T Howard

    • MIT
  • Amanda E Hubbard

    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology, PSFC
    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT
  • Jerry W Hughes

    • MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
    • MIT PSFC
  • Conor J Perks

    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT
  • Cristina Rea

    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology MI
  • Pablo Rodriguez-Fernandez

    • MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
  • John E Rice

    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT
  • Audrey Saltzman

    • MIT PSFC
    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology MI
  • Alex A Tinguely

    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    • MIT
    • MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
  • Theresa M Wilks

    • MIT-PSFC
    • MIT
  • Michael Wigram

    • MIT
  • Andrew O Nelson

    • Columbia University
  • Carlos A Paz-Soldan

    • Columbia University
  • Nikolas C Logan

    • Columbia University
    • Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab