Towards validated higher-fidelity AI models in fusion exhaust

ORAL

Abstract

A review is given on the highlights of a scatter-shot approach of developing machine-learning methods and artificial neural networks based fast predictors for the application to fusion exhaust. The aim is to enable and facilitate optimized and improved modelling allowing more flexible integration of physics models in the light of extrapolations towards future fusion devices. The project encompasses various research objectives: a) developments of surrogate model predictors for power & particle exhaust in fusion power plants; b) assessments of surrogate models for time-dependent phenomena in the plasma-edge; c) feasibility studies of micro-macro model discovery for plasma-facing components surface morphology & durability; and d) enhancements of pedestal models & databases through interpolators and generators exploiting uncertainty quantification. Presented results demonstrate useful applications for machine-learning and artificial intelligence in fusion exhaust modeling schemes, enabling an unprecedented combination of both fast and accurate simulation. Validated surrogate models are the foundations for accurate integrated models, such as for digital-twins or high-fidelity plasma simulators. Machine learning based techniques to improve the model fidelity, such as transfer or active learning, will be discussed.

*This work has been carried out within the framework of the EUROfusion Consortium, funded by the European Union via the Euratom Research and Training Programme (Grant Agreement No 101052200 — EUROfusion). Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Commission. Neither the European Union nor the European Commission can be held responsible for them.

Presenters

  • Sven Wiesen

    • DIFFER - Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research, De Zaale 20, 5612 AJ Eindhoven, Netherlands
    • DIFFER - Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research, De Zaale 20, 5612 AJ Eindhoven, the Netherlands

Authors

  • Sven Wiesen

    • DIFFER - Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research, De Zaale 20, 5612 AJ Eindhoven, Netherlands
    • DIFFER - Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research, De Zaale 20, 5612 AJ Eindhoven, the Netherlands
  • Stefan Dasbach

    • Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Institut fuer Energie- und Klimaforschung – Plasmaphysik, Juelich, Germany
  • Adam Kit

    • VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, VTT, Finland
  • Aaro E Jaervinen

    • VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, VTT, Finland
  • Andreas Gillgren

    • Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Aaron Ho

    • MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
    • DIFFER - Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research, De Zaale 20, 5612 AJ Eindhoven, the Netherlands
  • Alex Panera

    • DIFFER - Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research, De Zaale 20, 5612 AJ Eindhoven, the Netherlands
  • Dirk Reiser

    • Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Institut fuer Energie- und Klimaforschung – Plasmaphysik, Juelich, Germany
  • Martin Brenzke

    • Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Institut fuer Energie- und Klimaforschung – Plasmaphysik, Juelich, Germany
  • Yoeri Poels

    • Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Swiss Plasma Center, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Egbert Westerhof

    • DIFFER - Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research, De Zaale 20, 5612 AJ Eindhoven, the Netherlands
  • Gijs L Derks

    • DIFFER - Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research, De Zaale 20, 5612 AJ Eindhoven, the Netherlands
  • Vlado Menkowski

    • 5Eindhoven University of Technology, Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
  • Par Strand

    • Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden