Effective Transport Barriers without H-mode Bifurcation in DIII-D Negative Triangularity Plasmas

ORAL

Abstract

Diverted negative triangularity (NT) plasmas in DIII-D achieve high thermal confinement (H98y2 >~1) and normalized pressure βN >2.5 [1]. At strongly negative average triangularity (δAve ≤ -0.35) these plasmas do not bifurcate to H-mode even at high heating power Ploss/PLH-08 ≥10, but exbibit a narrow edge transport barrier on the order of ~2 ion gyro-radii wide. This barrier is supported by strong counter-current intrinsic rotation shear, consistent with theory [2] based on preferential turbulent loss of co-current passing ions in NT plasmas. Doppler Backscattering turbulence data demonstrate very short radial turbulence correlation lengths and the suppression of turbulence streamers/avalanches within the NT barrier, evidenced by a locally reduced Hurst exponent. Experimental evidence and infinite-n ballooning mode stability calculations suggest that the barrier layer cannot expand inward [3]; hence strong NT plasmas do not approach the peeling-ballooning stability limit and remain free of Edge Localized Modes (ELMs). In contrast, modest NT plasmas (δAve ≥ - 0.2) are characterized by intrinsic co-current edge rotation and edge profiles similar to typical PT plasmas, accessing ELMing H-mode at a power threshold below the 2008 ITPA power threshold scaling PLH-08.

[1] M. Austin, M. Marinoni, M.L. Walker et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 115001 (2019).

[2] T. Stoltzfus-Dueck, A.N. Karpushov, O. Sauter et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 245001 (2015).

[3] A.O. Nelson, L. Schmitz, C. Paz-Soldan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 195101 (2023).

*This work supported by the US Department of Energy under DE-SC0020287, DE-SC0019352, DE-FG02-97ER54415, DE-FG02-08ER54999, DE-FC02-04ER54698, and DE-SC0022270.

–

Presenters

  • Lothar W Schmitz

    • University of California Los Angeles, TAE Technologies
    • University of California, Los Angeles
    • University of California Los Angeles

Authors

  • Lothar W Schmitz

    • University of California Los Angeles, TAE Technologies
    • University of California, Los Angeles
    • University of California Los Angeles

  • A. O Nelson

    • Columbia University

  • X. Qin

    • University of California, Los Angeles
    • University of California Los Angeles

  • C. S Chang

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
    • Princeton University

  • P. H Diamond

    • University of California San Diego

  • K. J Callahan

    • University of California Los Angeles

  • Seung-Hoe Ku

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
    • Princeton University

  • F. Khabanov

    • University of Wisconsin, Madison
    • University of Wisconsin Madison

  • Lei Zeng

    • University of California, Los Angeles
    • University of California Los Angeles

  • Kathreen E Thome

    • General Atomics - San Diego
    • General Atomics

  • C. Paz-Soldan

    • Columbia University

  • Zheng Yan

    • University of Wisconsin - Madison
    • University of Wisconsin Madison

  • Max E Austin

    • University of Texas at Austin
    • University of Texas Austin