Improved Confinement in L-mode Negative Triangularity Plasmas in JET

POSTER

Abstract

Negative triangularity (NT) tokamak has proven to be promising for a DEMO reactor since it combines improved performance while staying in L-mode. In the recent years, experiments in TCV, AUG and DIII-D confirmed that the absence of access to the so-called 2nd ballooning stability region, at low magnetic shear and high normalized pressure gradient, is a sufficient condition to remain in L-mode. The theoretical framework to predict if a scenario will stay in L-mode or not, despite reactor relevant heat sources, is mature [1,2] and can be used for predictions for larger devices.

We challenged JET's shaping capabilities by computing the access to the 2nd stability region for different plasma shapes varying the top triangularity. It was found that a top triangularity of about -0.3 should be sufficient to prevent H-mode access. These shapes have been successfully tested in JET ($I_p=1.5MA$, $B_T=2.3T$) and, as predicted, plasmas stayed in L-mode despite 32 MW of total injected power. For comparison, a plasma with positive triangularity (PT) would have transited into H-mode with 5-10 MW of injected power. Even though the confinement was improved compared to a L-mode PT plasma, the tested triangularies in JET were not sufficiantly negative to reach H-mode like confinement. Nevertheless, TCV has shown that more negative triangularities are beneficial for confinement improvement and experiments are ongoing in TCV to quantify this effect starting from JET similar shapes.

[1] A. Marinoni, O. Sauter, \& S. Coda, Rev. Mod. Plasma Phys. 5, 6 (2021)

[2] A. O. Nelson et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{131}, 195101 (2023)

*This work has been carried out within the framework of the EUROfusion Consortium, partially funded by the European Union via the Euratom Research and Training Programme (Grant Agreement No 101052200 — EUROfusion). The Swiss contribution to this work has been funded by the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI). Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union, the European Commission or SERI. Neither the European Union nor the European Commission nor SERI can be held responsible for them.

Presenters

  • Benoit Labit

    • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

Authors

  • Benoit Labit

    • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
  • Olivier Sauter

    • EPFL
    • SPC-EPFL
    • Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne
  • Christopher Lowry

    • UKAEA
  • Peter J Lomas

    • UKAEA
  • Michael G Dunne

    • Max–Planck–Institut fuer Plasmaphysik
  • Athina Kappatou

    • Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Boltzmannstr. 2, 85748 Garching, Germany
  • Michael Faitsch

    • Max-Planck-Institute for Plasmaphysics
    • Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Boltzmannstr. 2, 85748 Garching, Germany
    • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Boltzmannstr. 2, 85748 Garching, Germany
  • Fulvio Auriemma

    • Consorzio RFX-CNR, ENEA, INFN, Università di Padova, Acciaierie Venete SpA, Padova, Italy, CNR-ISTP, Corso Stati Uniti 4
  • Michele Marin

    • EPFL
    • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
  • Eleonora Viezzer

    • Department of Atomic, Molecular and Nuclear Physics, University of Seville, Av. Reina Mercedes, Seville, 41012, Spain
    • University of Seville
  • Christian Perez von Thun

    • Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion
  • Emilia R Solano

    • Laboratorio Nacional de Fusion, CIEMAT