Increasing scaled performance in direct-drive inertial confinement fusion implosions through high-intensity subscale experiments on OMEGA

ORAL

Abstract

Recent experiments in the cryogenic direct-drive implosion campaign on OMEGA have assessed the use of high intensities to increase yield and areal density. This was enabled in part by the use of Si-doped ablators that partially mitigate hot-electron generation by two-plasmon decay (TPD), allowing intensities to exceed 1015 W/cm2 without significantly preheating the target. To achieve these greater intensities, “subscale” implosions were performed on OMEGA, where phase plates reduced the waists of the beams from a nominal 358 μm to 287 μm. Similarly, target diameters were also reduced by about 20% from a nominal 930 μm to as low as 740 μm. Using this subscale design, thick-ice capsules (68 μm of frozen DT) were fielded to provide hydrodynamically stable implosions and driven with intensities from 0.9 × 1015 W/cm2 to 1.4 × 1015 W/cm2. Measured areal density increased with intensity due to the greater ablation pressure before dropping at the highest intensity, likely due to hot-electron preheat limiting the capsule’s convergence, suggesting that TPD degradations are suppressed up to at least 1.4 × 1015 W/cm2. Using this knowledge, subscale implosions are now being optimized to improve both yield and areal density. Early efforts have already achieved the scaled performance of their highly optimized full-scale counterparts, with projected Lawson parameters of χMJ ~ 0.87 when projected to 2.15 MJ of driver energy.

*This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy [National Nuclear Security Administration] University of Rochester "National Inertial Confinement Fusion Program" under Award Number(s) DE-NA0004144.

Presenters

  • Luke A Ceurvorst

    • Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester
    • University of Rochester

Authors

  • Luke A Ceurvorst

    • Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester
    • University of Rochester
  • Duc M Cao

    • Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester
    • U. Rochester/LLE
  • Aarne Lees

    • University of Rochester - Laboratory for Laser Energetics
    • Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester
    • University of Rochester
  • Riccardo Betti

    • Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester
    • Laboratory for Laser Energy, Rochester, NY, USA.
  • James P Knauer

    • Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester
    • University of Rochester
  • Varchas Gopalaswamy

    • Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester
    • Laboratory for Laser Energetics - Rochester
  • Chad Forrest

    • Laboratory for Laser Energetics
    • Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester
  • Christian Stoeckl

    • Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester
    • University of Rochester
  • Hannah McClow

    • Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester
  • Cliff A Thomas

    • Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester
    • Laboratory for Laser Energetics
    • University of Rochester Laboratory for Laser Energetics (LLE)
  • Timothy J Collins

    • Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester
  • Valeri N Goncharov

    • Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester
    • University of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics
  • Michael J Rosenberg

    • University of Rochester Laboratory for Laser Energetics (LLE)
    • Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester
    • University of Rochester
  • Sean P Regan

    • Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester