Advances in Multi-device Tokamak Disruption Event Characterization and Forecasting (DECAF) Research

POSTER

Abstract

Disruption event characterization and forecasting (DECAF**) research determines the relation of events leading to disruption providing event onset forecasts with high accuracy and sufficiently early warning to allow disruption avoidance [1]. Real-time application of DECAF was made on the KSTAR superconducting tokamak including initial connection to control actuators producing over 50 plasma shots with nearly equal disrupted / non-disrupted cases that were forecast with 100% accuracy. With highly successful objective prediction performance numbers established both in database analysis and real-time applications of DECAF, research advances to broaden the physics and technical events needed to produce such high accuracy for any plasma analyzed. A multi-device study conducted for plasma vertical instability produced real-time capable modelling with prediction accuracy of 98.6% - 100% over multiple devices. A DECAF VDE forecaster event has recently been produced based on a stabilization physics model to give 3 times earlier VDE warnings. High bandwidth Te profile measurements are used to reconstruct real-time capable ‘crash profiles’ to computationally identify sawteeth, ELMs, and more global MHD as NTM triggers and as direct disruption precursors. Impurity radiative collapses are examined showing that trigger Events often lead to more complex Event chains before disruption. Research also advances past feedforward control by connecting DECAF Events in feedback control for disruption avoidance.

**U.S. and international patents pending.

*Supported by U.S. DOE grants DE-SC0020415, DE-SC0021311, and DE-SC0018623.

Publication: [1] S.A. Sabbagh, et al., Phys. Plasmas 30 (2023) 032506; https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0133825

Presenters

  • Steve A Sabbagh

    • Columbia U. / PPPL
    • Columbia University

Authors

  • Steve A Sabbagh

    • Columbia U. / PPPL
    • Columbia University
  • Guillermo Bustos-Ramirez

    • Columbia University
  • Juan D Riquezes

    • Columbia University
  • Matthew Tobin

    • Columbia University
  • Veronika Zamkovska

    • Columbia University
  • Joseph R Jepson

    • Columbia University
  • Hankyu Lee

    • Columbia University
  • Frederick Sheehan

    • Columbia University
  • Grant Tillinghast

    • Columbia University
  • Jun Gyo Bak

    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • Minjun J. Choi

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • KFE
  • Hyunsun Han

    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • Jayhyun Kim

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • Jinseok Ko

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • Won Ha Ko

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • Jong-Ha Lee

    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • Kyu-Dong Lee

    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • Youngho Lee

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • Yongun Nam

    • KFE
    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • Young-Seok Park

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
    • KFE
  • Si-Woo Yoon

    • Korea Institute of Fusion Energy
  • Keith Erickson

    • PPPL
    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
  • Jongsoo Yoo

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
  • Fred Michael Levinton

    • Nova Photonics
  • Matthew E Galante

    • Nova Photonics Inc.
  • Christopher Ham

    • Culham Science Centre
  • Sam Blackmore

    • UKAEA
    • UKAEA - United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority
  • Geof Cunningham

    • UKAEA
  • David Ryan

    • UKAEA - United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority
  • Andrew J Thornton

    • Culham Science Centre