First Alternative Divertor Configuration Experiments at ASDEX Upgrade

ORAL

Abstract

Power exhaust is a major challenge for future tokamak fusion reactors. Over 90% of the heating power must be radiated before reaching the divertor targets to ensure a sufficiently long material lifetime. The divertor must also pump fuel and helium neutrals efficiently while keeping core impurity levels low. It remains uncertain whether the conventional single null (SN) divertor planned for ITER can meet these requirements in a fusion reactor.

Alternative Divertor Configurations (ADCs), using strong magnetic shaping and additional X-points, may outperform SN divertors. ADCs have shown significant advantages at TCV, MAST-U, and other devices [1]. ASDEX Upgrade (AUG), following a major upgrade, is the first device combining ADC capability with reactor-relevant heat fluxes, a full tungsten wall, and a cryopump, enabling detailed studies under fusion-relevant conditions [2]. We present first ADC experiments at AUG, including H-modes with >20 MW heating and strong impurity radiation. As the flux expansion increases, electron temperatures close to the strike line and target particle fluxes are reduced. With the transition to configurations with multiple X-points, the radiation at the X-points is enhanced and the heat fluxes at the primary strike point reduced. The results are interpreted using analytic models and advanced transport simulations.

[1] A. Fil et al 2022 Nucl. Fusion 62 096026

[2] Zammuto, I., et al.,Fusion Eng. Des. 215 (2025): 115028.

*This work has been carried out within the framework of the EUROfusion Consortium,funded by the European Union via the Euratom Research and Training Programme(Grant Agreement No 101052200 — EUROfusion). Views and opinions expressedare however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of theEuropean Union or the European Commission. Neither the European Union nor theEuropean Commission can be held responsible for them.

Presenters

  • Dominik Brida

    • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics

Authors

  • Dominik Brida

    • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics
  • Tilmann Lunt

    • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Garching, Germany
  • Bernhard Sieglin

    • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Garching, Germany
  • Ou Pan

    • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Garching, Germany
  • Felix Albrecht

    • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Garching, Germany
  • Matthias Bernert

    • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics
  • Ralph Dux

    • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Garching, Germany
  • Michael Faitsch

    • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics
    • Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Boltzmannstr. 2, 85748 Garching, Germany
  • Manuel Herschel

    • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Garching, Germany
  • Bernd Kurzan

    • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics
  • Hannah Lindl

    • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Garching, Germany
  • Antonello Zito

    • Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik
  • Christian Theiler

    • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Swiss Plasma Center (SPC)
    • EPFL - Swiss Plasma Center (SPC)
    • EPFL Swiss Plasma Center
    • EPFL Swiss Plasma Center (SPC)
  • Kevin Verhaegh

    • Eindhoven University of Technology
    • TUe