Assessment of alternative divertor configurations in TCV via experiments and interpretative SOLPS-ITER modelling

POSTER

Abstract

Alternative divertor configurations (ADCs) are assessed by performing experiments in the TCV tokamak and interpretative SOLPS-ITER modelling, and comparing both with simple analytical models that predict benefits of these configurations for detachment access and control. Thanks to its characteristic shaping capabilities and a complete set of divertor diagnostics, TCV is an ideal testbed to verify the working principles of ADCs as exhaust solutions. SOLPS-ITER modelling, including drifts and impurities, allows for a thorough analysis of the different physical processes at play.

The investigation of ADCs is carried out by isolating geometrical features in the outer divertor, and testing their effect on detachment access and control. These geometrical features include poloidal connection length, poloidal flux expansion, total flux expansion, the presence of a secondary X-point. Dedicated experiments, and corresponding simulations, that cover a wide range of plasma scenarios and detachment strategies, are the basis for a unique holistic assessment of ADC physics. Significant discrepancies with respect to the simplified analytical models are highlighted, and attributed to invalid assumptions or neglected effects, such as those related to parallel flows in the divertor. These are discussed in details, together with their implications for the extrapolation to future fusion reactors.

Presenters

  • Massimo Carpita

    • EPFL Swiss Plasma Center
    • EPFL - Swiss Plasma Center (SPC)
    • EPFL-SPC

Authors

  • Massimo Carpita

    • EPFL Swiss Plasma Center
    • EPFL - Swiss Plasma Center (SPC)
    • EPFL-SPC
  • Olivier Fevrier

    • EPFL - Swiss Plasma Center (SPC)
    • EPFL Swiss Plasma Center
    • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
    • Swiss Plasma Center, EPFL, Lausanne
  • Kenneth Lee

    • EPFL - Swiss Plasma Center (SPC)
    • EPFL Swiss Plasma Center
    • EPFL-SPC
  • Holger Reimerdes

    • EPFL - Swiss Plasma Center (SPC)
    • EPFL Swiss Plasma Center
    • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
  • Christian Theiler

    • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Swiss Plasma Center (SPC)
    • EPFL - Swiss Plasma Center (SPC)
    • EPFL Swiss Plasma Center
    • EPFL Swiss Plasma Center (SPC)
  • Elena Tonello

    • EPFL Swiss Plasma Center
    • EPFL - Swiss Plasma Center (SPC)
    • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
  • Dominik Brida

    • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics
  • Benjamin Brown

    • EPFL Swiss Plasma Center
    • EPFL - Swiss Plasma Center (SPC)
    • EPFL-SPC
  • Garance Durr-Legoupil-Nicoud

    • EPFL Swiss Plasma Center
    • EPFL - Swiss Plasma Center (SPC)
    • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
  • Richard Ducker

    • EPFL Swiss Plasma Center
    • EPFL - Swiss Plasma Center (SPC)
    • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
  • Daniele Hamm

    • EPFL Swiss Plasma Center
    • EPFL - Swiss Plasma Center (SPC)
    • EPFL-SPC
  • Riccardo I Morgan

    • EPFL Swiss Plasma Center
    • EPFL - Swiss Plasma Center (SPC)
    • EPFL-SPC
  • Artur Perek

    • EPFL Swiss Plasma Center
    • EPFL - Swiss Plasma Center (SPC)
    • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
  • Luke Simons

    • EPFL Swiss Plasma Center
    • Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, SPC
  • Kevin Verhaegh

    • Eindhoven University of Technology
    • TUe
  • Martim Zurita

    • EPFL Swiss Plasma Center
    • EPFL - Swiss Plasma Center (SPC)
    • Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne