Impact of Ballooning-Like Cross-Field Transport on In-Out Divertor Power Asymmetries in SPARC Long-Legged Geometries

POSTER

Abstract

Several SOLPS-ITER L-mode Q>1 (fG~0.1—0.5) simulations of SPARC single-null divertor configurations yield the majority of exhaust power reaching the inner target. This effect is connected in this work to the poloidal distribution of power crossing the separatrix (q⊥), using SOLPS-ITER "ballooning" transport coefficients to scale local perpendicular diffusivities by 〈B〉/ Bα: larger α enhance low-field-side power fluxes, and move the stagnation point towards the outer midplane. Additionally, scanning upstream collisionality (αt~0.1—1.0) in longer-legged geometries can reverse the in-out target power asymmetry, as reported in [J. Lore et al. Nucl. Fusion 2024]. Comparing simulations with and without currents enabled shows that thermoelectric currents enhance pre-existing asymmetries.

We interpret the results using a self-consistent "three-point model": inner and outer target, and a common stagnation point. The poloidal distribution of q⊥ is a significant driver of in-out asymmetries, and adjusting it yields good agreement with SOLPS-ITER, capturing the stagnation point's dependency on collisionality and geometry. For outer legs comparable to the inner leg (~5—10 m), Pin/Pout<1 is observed in SPARC-relevant regimes. For longer outer legs (~25—50 m), q⊥ profiles less peaked at the outer midplane lead to Pin/Pout>1. A more realistic implementation of ballooning-like transport may beneficially balance the in-out power asymmetries in SOLPS-ITER.

*Supported by Commonwealth Fusion Systems

Presenters

  • Leonardo Corsaro

    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Authors

  • Leonardo Corsaro

    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Michael Robert Knox Wigram

    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Rebecca L Masline

    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Sean B Ballinger

    • Commonwealth Fusion Systems
  • Marco Andrés Miller

    • MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Earl S Marmar

    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Haosheng Wu

    • Politecnico di Torino
  • Thomas H Eich

    • Commonwealth Fusion Systems