Assessment of the Cross-Beam Energy Transfer (CBET) Risk for Polar Direct-Drive Wetted-Foam Designs
ORAL
Abstract
The polar direct-drive wetted-foam concept[1] is a promising design for achieving high-gain in inertial confinement fusion (ICF). The baseline target is composed of a spherical shell of 3D-printed (2pp) lattice that is wetted with liquid deuterium-tritium (DT) fuel, and surrounds a central DT gas region. A thin layer of CH typically coats the exterior of the target, and prevents leakage of the fuel. Such designs are thought to be advantageous for a variety of reasons, including high laser-target coupling, and good hydrodynamic efficiency.
One important aspect of the PDD-WF concept is that for much of the pulse, the laser will be ablating the wetted-foam, in contrast to the CH ablator typically used for conventional direct-drive targets. It is therefore important to understand the susceptibility of this ablator material to laser-plasma instabilities (LPI).
In this presentation, we discuss the risk posed by cross-beam energy transfer (CBET) to PDD-WF designs proposed for the National Ignition Facility. We investigate this via a combination of radiation hydrodynamics modelling, laser ray-trace calculations, and theoretical considerations. We find that ablation of wetted-foam leads generally to increased CBET losses relative to CH, and discuss the reasons for this. Finally, we consider possible mitigation strategies for CBET.
One important aspect of the PDD-WF concept is that for much of the pulse, the laser will be ablating the wetted-foam, in contrast to the CH ablator typically used for conventional direct-drive targets. It is therefore important to understand the susceptibility of this ablator material to laser-plasma instabilities (LPI).
In this presentation, we discuss the risk posed by cross-beam energy transfer (CBET) to PDD-WF designs proposed for the National Ignition Facility. We investigate this via a combination of radiation hydrodynamics modelling, laser ray-trace calculations, and theoretical considerations. We find that ablation of wetted-foam leads generally to increased CBET losses relative to CH, and discuss the reasons for this. Finally, we consider possible mitigation strategies for CBET.
[1] R. E. Olson et al., “A polar direct drive liquid deuterium–tritium wetted foam target concept for inertial confinement fusion,” Physics of Plasmas 28(12), 1–9 (2021).
*This work conducted under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Triad National Security, LLC, operator of the Los Alamos National Laboratory under Contract No. 89233218CNA000001, with support from the Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program.
–
Presenters
-
Alexander G Seaton
- Los Alamos National Laboratory