Gyrokinetic Study of Divertor Heat-Load Width in Turbulent Edge Plasma and Comparison with the Two-Point Model

POSTER

Abstract

Recent electromagnetic gyrokinetic simulations using XGC have successfully reproduced the divertor heat-flux width (λq) on present-day tokamaks and predicted significantly wider λq on full-current ITER [1] and in the turbulent QH-mode discharges on DIII-D [2] than Eich’s empirical scaling predictions. In this work, we extend the previous simulations with improved numerical accuracy and longer time simulation, enabled by a new quiet start scheme that reduces spurious transients and particle noise in the edge region [3]. With this more robust dataset, we examine heat-flux profiles in detail and compare them against the classical two-point model. Realistic divertor boundary conditions and neutral physics were essential to match experimental λq, underscoring their critical role in modeling SOL transport [2]. Additionally, preliminary analysis indicates that turbulence near the X-point [2] and along the divertor leg may contribute to the broadening of parallel heat flux. These results support the importance of incorporating comprehensive edge physics - including neutral, boundary, and turbulence effects - to adequately describe the heat-flux footprint in tokamak fusion reactors.



[1] C.S. Chang et al., Nucl. Fusion Nucl. Fusion 57, 116023 (2017); Phys. Plasmas 28, 022501 (2021)

[2] D. R. Ernst et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 235102 (2024)

[3] S. Ku et al., presented at APS-DPP 2025

*This research is supported by Korea-ITER postdoctoral fellowship program and US DOE (DE-FC02-04ER54698, DE-SC0014264, DE-AC02-09CH11466), and utilized NERSC resources.

Publication: S.-J. Lee et al., Phys. Plasmas (planned)

Presenters

  • Sang-Jun Lee

    • ITER Organization

Authors

  • Sang-Jun Lee

    • ITER Organization
  • S.-H. Ku

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL)
  • Robert Hager

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL)
  • C.S. Chang

    • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
  • Alberto Loarte

    • ITER Organization
  • Aaron Scheinberg

    • Jubilee Development
  • Darin R Ernst

    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology