Profile prediction of negative triangularity plasma in ASDEX Upgrade using PORTALS-GX

POSTER

Abstract

The PORTALS framework [1] couples local gyrokinetic simulations (CGYRO [2], TGLF [3, 4]) with global transport solvers (TRANSP [5]), and leverages surrogate modelling and optimization techniques to iteratively solve for steady-state, flux-matched plasma profiles. This framework produces high-fidelity predictions of core plasma profiles and performance at significantly reduced costs, with no loss of accuracy. In this work, the nonlinear gyrokinetic code, GX [6], was first benchmarked against CGYRO for a negative triangularity case from ASDEX Upgrade [7], accounting for Miller geometry, electromagnetic effects, 3 gyrokinetic species, and ITG and TEM turbulence drive. We found that GX models ITG turbulence well, but underestimates TEM turbulence. GX was then coupled with PORTALS and the first tokamak profile prediction using this code was performed. The results were compared to previous PORTALS-CGYRO [8] and ASTRA-TGLF [9] studies and validated against experimental measurements. With GX capable of accepting either 2D or 3D plasma shaping, the new PORTALS-GX framework expands the scope of profile prediction to both tokamak and stellarator geometries, which future work aims to explore.

*This work is supported by the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, under the National Science Scholarship (PhD), and by the United States Department of Energy under Award DE-SC0014264. This work has been carried out within the framework of the EUROfusion Consortium, funded by the European Union via the Euratom Research and Training Programme under Grant Agreement No. 101052200[JS1]. This research used resources of the MIT Office of Research Computing and Data, and the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), a Department of Energy User Facility using NERSC award FES-ERCAP0031419.

Publication: [1] Rodriguez-Fernandez, P., et al. "Enhancing predictive capabilities in fusion burning plasmas through surrogate-based optimization in core transport solvers." Nuclear Fusion 64.7 (2024): 076034.
[2] Candy, Jeff, Emily A. Belli, and R. V. Bravenec. "A high-accuracy Eulerian gyrokinetic solver for collisional plasmas." Journal of Computational Physics 324 (2016): 73-93.
[3] Staebler, G. M., and J. E. Kinsey. "Electron collisions in the trapped gyro-Landau fluid transport model." Physics of Plasmas 17.12 (2010).
[4] Staebler, G. M., J. E. Kinsey, and R. E. Waltz. "A theory-based transport model with comprehensive physics." Physics of Plasmas 14.5 (2007).
[5] Breslau, Joshua, et al. Transp. Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), Princeton, NJ (United States), 2018.
[6] Mandell, Noah R., et al. "GX: a GPU-native gyrokinetic turbulence code for tokamak and stellarator design." Journal of Plasma Physics 90.4 (2024): 905900402.
[7] Vanovac, B., et al. "Pedestal properties of negative triangularity discharges in ASDEX Upgrade." Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 66.11 (2024): 115005.
[8] Bielajew, Rachel, et al. "Gyrokinetic profile prediction and validation of a negative triangularity plasma in ASDEX Upgrade." Nuclear Fusion (2025).
[9] Aucone, L., et al. "Experiments and modelling of negative triangularity ASDEX Upgrade plasmas in view of DTT scenarios." Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 66.7 (2024): 075013.

Presenters

  • Xavior X Wang

    • MIT PSFC

Authors

  • Xavior X Wang

    • MIT PSFC
  • Pablo Rodriguez-Fernandez

    • MIT PSFC
  • Nathan T Howard

    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    • MIT PSFC
  • Branka Vanovac

    • MIT PSFC
  • Rachel Bielajew

    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Paola Mantica

    • Istituto per la Scienza e Tecnologia dei Plasmi, CNR, Milano
  • Tim Happel

    • Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Boltzmannstr. 2, 85748 Garching, Germany
  • Anne Elisabeth White

    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology - Plasma Science and Fusion Center (PSFC)