Disruption dynamics during the first operation of a Runaway Electron Mitigation Coil (REMC) on a tokamak
ORAL · Invited
Abstract
Runaway electrons (REs) generated in high current tokamaks during disruptions pose a significant hazard for damaging first-wall components [1]. Preventing localized deposition of strong RE currents on first-wall components is critical to the commercial viability of reactor-scale tokamaks. Various active means of mitigating REs include injection of material [2,3] and triggering a large non-axisymmetric magnetic field [4]. Here, we detail the first passive mitigation scheme that does not require a control system or predictive capability, commonly called a Runaway Electron Mitigation Coil (REMC) [5]. The disruption loop voltage drives a large current in a non-axisymmetric coil which destroys plasma symmetry, causing stochastic magnetic fields when combined with the plasma response and reducing energetic particle confinement. A dedicated n = 1 REMC, similar to the geometry being implemented for the SPARC tokamak [6], now routinely operates in the HBT-EP tokamak [7]. Roughly 12% of the pre-disruption plasma current couples into the REMC during the current quench (CQ), excluding current driven by the ramping external coils. Consistent with plasma-wall contact from a large-scale locked n = 1 perturbation, halo currents redistribute during disruptions, though rotating features still dominate most of the CQ. Discharges with slide-away electrons are used to study energetic electron confinement. With the REMC active, we observe changes in measured hard x-ray emission, showing the REMC's influence on energetic electron impacts. Vacuum vessel force measurements, high-speed videography, and detailed electromagnetic calculations will also be discussed.
[1] Lehnen, M. et al., J. Nucl. Materials 463 (2015) 39
[2] Shiraki, D. et al., Nucl. Fusion 58, 5 (2018) 056006
[3] Sheikh, U. et al., Plas. Phys. Contrl. Fusion 66, 3 (2024) 035003
[4] Tanna, R.L. et al., Nucl. Fusion 63, 8 (2023) 086011
[5] Boozer, A.H., Plas. Phys. Contrl. Fus. 53, 8 (2011) 084002
[6] Tinguely, R.A. et al., Nucl. Fusion 61, 12 (2021) 124003
[7] Saperstein, A.R. et al., Phys. Plasmas 30, 4 (2023) 042506
[1] Lehnen, M. et al., J. Nucl. Materials 463 (2015) 39
[2] Shiraki, D. et al., Nucl. Fusion 58, 5 (2018) 056006
[3] Sheikh, U. et al., Plas. Phys. Contrl. Fusion 66, 3 (2024) 035003
[4] Tanna, R.L. et al., Nucl. Fusion 63, 8 (2023) 086011
[5] Boozer, A.H., Plas. Phys. Contrl. Fus. 53, 8 (2011) 084002
[6] Tinguely, R.A. et al., Nucl. Fusion 61, 12 (2021) 124003
[7] Saperstein, A.R. et al., Phys. Plasmas 30, 4 (2023) 042506
*Support by US DOE, Grant DE-FG02-86ER53222. Acknowledging work of the HBT-EP team: J.A. Andrello N.J. DaSilva, M.N. Notis, A.E. Braun, D.A. Arnold, J.E. Chiriboga, C.J. Hansen, M.E. Mauel, G.A. Navratil, and C.A. Paz-Soldan
–
Publication: We will soon submit the first two publications on our Runaway Electron Mitigation Coil (REMC) results, one focused on experimental results and the other about validating simulations
Presenters
-
Jeffrey P Levesque
- Columbia University