Gyrokinetic microtearing turbulence in the stellarator Wendelstein 7-X
ORAL
Abstract
Following the optimization of the stellarator Wendelstein 7-X (W7-X) to reduce neoclassical transport [1], microturbulence prevails as the primary transport mechanism limiting its plasma confinement. While electrostatic turbulent modes – such as the ion-temperature-gradient (ITG) and the electron-temperature-gradient (ETG) modes – have been recognized as key drivers of turbulent transport across a wide range of W7-X operational scenarios [1, 2, 3, 4], this work presents the first demonstration that a type of electromagnetic turbulence, specifically driven by microtearing modes (MTMs), dominates in a different experimental regime. This scenario, characterized by only neutral beam injection (NBI) heating, displays a steep density gradient and moderate ion and electron temperature gradients in the inner core (ρ ≤ 0.5).
Using reasonably heat and particle flux-matched simulations with the gyrokinetic code GENE [5] including experimental profiles, collisions and electromagnetic effects, we show that MTMs are the primary contributors to turbulent transport in this scenario. This work highlights the importance of incorporating electromagnetic effects and collisions to reproduce experimental fluxes – parameters that were excluded in previous studies of density-gradient-driven regimes [6, 7]. In addition, our simulations show that density-gradient-driven trapped electron modes (TEMs) are not unstable. This stabilization is likely due to the maximum-J property of devices such as W7-X [8].
*This work has been carried out within the framework of the EURO fusion Consortium, funded by the European Union via the Euratom Research and Training Programme (Grant Agreement No 101052200 - EUROfusion). Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Commission. Neither the European Union nor the European Commission can be held responsible for them
–
Publication:[1] T.S. Pedersen, et al., 2022 Nucl. Fusion 62 042022 [2] T. Klinger, et al., 2019 Nucl. Fusion 59 112004 [3] F. Wilms, et al., 2024 Nucl. Fusion 64 096940 [4] D. Fernando, et al., 2025 arXiv:2503.08943v1 [5] F. Jenko, et al., 2000 Phys. Plasmas 7 5 [6] P. Costello, et al., 2023 J. Plasma Phys. 89 905890402 [7] H. Thienpondt, et al., 2025 Nucl. Fusion 65 016062 [8] J. Proll, et al., 2012 Phys. Rev. Let. 108 245002 [9] O. Grulke et al 2024 Nucl. Fusion 64 112002
Presenters
Hugo Isaac Cu Castillo
Max-Planck-Institute for Plasma Physics (IPP Garching)
Authors
Hugo Isaac Cu Castillo
Max-Planck-Institute for Plasma Physics (IPP Garching)
Alejandro B Navarro
Max-Planck-Institute for Plasma Physics (IPP Garching)
Max-Planck-Institute for Plasma Physics, Garching
Gabriele Merlo
Max-Planck-Institute for Plasma Physics
Frank Jenko
Max-Planck-Institute for Plasma Physics (IPP Garching)
Oliver Ford
Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics
Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Greifswald, Germany
Max-Planck-Institute for Plasma Physics (IPP Greifswald)
Sebastian Bannmann
Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics
Joachim Geiger
Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics
Markus Wappl
Max-Planck-Institute for Plasma Physics
Peter Zsolt Poloskei
Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Greifswald