A Tale of Two Curricula: The performance of two thousand students in introductory electromagnetism
ORAL
Abstract
Student performance in introductory calculus-based electromagnetism (E\&M) courses at four large research universities was measured using the Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment (BEMA). Two different curricula were used at these universities: a traditional E\&M curriculum and the Matter \& Interactions (M\&I) curriculum. At each university, post-instruction BEMA test averages were significantly higher for the M\&I curriculum than for the traditional curriculum. The differences in post-test averages cannot be explained by differences in variables such as pre-instruction BEMA scores, grade point average, or SAT scores.
–
Authors
-
Michael Schatz
School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology
-
Matthew Kohlmyer
School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology
-
Marcos Caballero
School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology
-
Ruth Chabay
Department of Physics, North Carolina State University
-
Bruce Sherwood
Department of Physics, North Carolina State University
-
Richard Catrambone
School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology
-
Marcus Marr
School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology
-
Mark Haugen
Department of Physics, Purdue University
-
Lin Ding
Department of Physics, The Ohio State University