A Tale of Two Curricula: The performance of two thousand students in introductory electromagnetism

ORAL

Abstract

Student performance in introductory calculus-based electromagnetism (E\&M) courses at four large research universities was measured using the Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment (BEMA). Two different curricula were used at these universities: a traditional E\&M curriculum and the Matter \& Interactions (M\&I) curriculum. At each university, post-instruction BEMA test averages were significantly higher for the M\&I curriculum than for the traditional curriculum. The differences in post-test averages cannot be explained by differences in variables such as pre-instruction BEMA scores, grade point average, or SAT scores.

Authors

  • Michael Schatz

    School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology

  • Matthew Kohlmyer

    School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology

  • Marcos Caballero

    School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology

  • Ruth Chabay

    Department of Physics, North Carolina State University

  • Bruce Sherwood

    Department of Physics, North Carolina State University

  • Richard Catrambone

    School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology

  • Marcus Marr

    School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology

  • Mark Haugen

    Department of Physics, Purdue University

  • Lin Ding

    Department of Physics, The Ohio State University