DEFINITION of (so MIScalled) ``Complexity" As UTTER-SIMPLICITY!!!(sMciUS!!!) VERSUS DEVIATIONS FROM( sMciUS!!!): ``COMPLICATEDNESS" DEFINITION(S) and MEASURE(S)!!!

(so MIScalled) ``complexity''(sMc) associated BOTH SCALE- INVARIANCE Symmetry-RESTORING(S-I S-R) [vs. S-I S-B!!!], AND X (w)~P(w )~1/w$^{(1.000...)}$ ``pink''/Zipf/Archimedes-HYPERBOLICITY INEVITABILITY CONNECTION is by simple-calculus SISR's logarithm- function derivative: (d/dw)ln(w)=1/w=1/w$^{(1.000...)}$, hence: (d/dw) [SISR](w)=1/w=1/w$^{(1.000...)}$=(via Noether-theorem relating continuous-(SISR)-symmetries to conservation-laws)=(d/dw)[4-DIV (J(INTER-SCALE)=0](w)=1/w =1/w$^{(1.000...)}$. Hence sMc is information inter-scale conservation [as Anderson-Mandell, Fractals of Brain; Fractals of Mind(1994)-experimental- psychology!!!], i.e. sMciUS!!!, VERSUS ``COMPLICATEDNESS", is sMcciUS!!!: EITHER: PLUS (Additive: Murphy's-law absence) OR TIMES (Multiplicative: Murphy's-law dominance) various disparate system-specificity ``COMPLICATIONS". ``COMPLICATEDNESS" MEASURES: DEVIATIONS FROM sMciUS!!!: EITHER [S-I S-B] MINUS [S- I S-R] AND/OR [``red"/Pareto X(w)~P(w)~1/w$^{(\#=/=1.000...)}$] MINUS [X(w)~P(w)~1/w$^{(1.000...)}$ ``pink"/Zipf/Archimedes-HYPERBOLICITY INEVITABILITY] = [1/w$^{(\#=/=1.000...)}$] MINUS [1/w$^{(1.000...)}$]; almost but not exactly a fractals Hurst-exponent-like [\# - 1.000...]!!!