MONTE-CARLO Simulations ``QUANTUM''-``NOISE'' POWER-SPECTRUM 0$=$(F$=$ma)$=$0 Uniform-Velocity Pareto/Red/Beethoven-Law VS 0$\ne $(F$=$ma)$\ne $0 Uniform-Acceleration/Deceleration/Bremsstrahlung Archimedes-(Euclid-Descartes)-Zipf/Pink/Flicker/Bach-Law UNIVERSALITY INEVITABILITY!!!

Dynamics vs usual by-rote kinematics treatment/lack of understanding, via Siegel[AIP Shock-Physics Confs. Chicago(2011); Seattle(2013)] simple classical-mechanics/dynamics simple-insights]-Panofsky-Phillips[E{\&}M (1960s)],of Monte Carlo[Kaplan et.al.[PRL 107, 201601 (11)]:'''Noise', Sign-Problems {\&} Statistics'']-simulations' \textbraceleft Hamersley-Handscombe, Monte Carlo Methods, Methuen(64-75)\textbraceright ``noises'' power-spectra\textbraceleft SEMINAL Montroll [(60s-80s)\textbraceright -Boccara[ ``Modeling'' ``Complex''-Sys.(02)-ch.-8/p.-311]-West et.al.[Physics of Fractal-Operators, Springer(00)]-Shlesinger-Lindenberg-Handel-van Vliet-Jonscher-Ngai-\textellipsis -Siegel[Schrodinger Symp., Imperial-College (1987);Copenhagen-Onterp. 50-Yrs. After Como-Lect.,Symp.Fdns.Mod.Phys., Joensu(87)]\textbraceright , in the light of Siegel[MRS Fall-Mtgs. Boston: Symp. Fractals(89)-5-papers!!!; Symp. Scaling(90); Symp.Transport in Geometric-Constraints(90)] power-law decay algebraicity vs. white/flat/functionless [analogous to Fokker-Planck-eqn. two-terms Dichotomy, relatively: static/non-diffusive vs diffusive!!!] but dimensionality-dependence: first-odd-integer ${\rm Z}$ vs. first-even-integer ${\rm Z}$: 2-D bulk-region -area - dominated constant