DIGIT-PHYSICS: Digits Are Bosons Are Quanta Because (On Average) Quanta and Bosons Are and Always Were Digits!!!;Contra Wigner, ``On the Unreasonable Effectiveness of \textbf{\textit{Physics in}} Mathematics!''; Do Physics-NECESSARY-Averages Equal or VS. DIGITS-Log-LawS(!!!) Averages???

Zurek(1981-\textellipsis ): ``Not Its But Bits''; Newcomb(1881)!!!: ``Not Bits But Its''!!! DIGITS?: ``For a Very Long Time Giving Us All The FINGER''!!!: ``DIGIT-\textbf{\textit{PHYSICS}}'': Contra Wigner, ``On the Unreasonable Effectiveness of \textbf{\textit{Physics in}} Mathematics!''; A Surprise in Theoretical/Experimental Physics and/or Ostensibly Pure-Mathematics: \textless PHYSICS: Q.-M./S.M.\textgreater $=$???$=$\textless DIGITS\textgreater -LAW(S) . DIGITS' ostensibly ``pure-mathematics'' \underline {Ne}wcomb[Am.J.Math.4,39(1\underline {\textbf{\textit{8}}}81)]-\underline {W}eyl[Math.Ann.,77,313 (\underline {\textbf{\textit{16}}})]-\underline {Be}nford[J.Am.Phil Soc,78,115(\underline {\textbf{\textit{38}}})] empirical inter-digit (\textit{on-average}) (DIGITS are \underline {\textbf{\textit{not}}} random-variables!!!) \textit{statistical}-correlations ``(\underline {NeWBe})-Logarithmic-Law'' $(

\equiv <\omega >)(d)=\log_{10} \left( {+1+\frac{1}{d}} \right);d(\in Z)\in [0!,9];0\le (

\equiv \omega )(\notin Z)\le 1$ Hill [Proc. AMS 123, 887( 95)] vs, Jech[PSU/Brown!-(95)] root-cause ultimate-origin proof: scale-invariance $=$ base-invariance $=$ units-invariance proof)[N.Y.T. (8/4/'98); Am. Sci. (7-8/`98); New Sci. (7/10/'99)] sequential \textbf{\textit{INVERSION }} to \underline {\textbf{\textit{only}}} \textbf{\textit{Bose-Einstein}} \textit{quantum-statistics} (``\textit{Spin(}\underline {\textit{E}}\textit{)less-BoZos}''(``SoB'''s)) $\frac{1}{10^{

}-1}=d(

)$, \textit{and} Taylor/power-series-$<\left( {(

\equiv <\omega >)><<1} \right)$- \textbf{\textit{EXPANSION }}to $d\left( {(

\equiv <\omega >} \right)=\frac{1}{10^{(

\equiv \omega )}-1}\cong \frac{1}{[+1+(

\equiv <\omega >)+...]-1}\cong \frac{1}{(

\equiv <\omega >)}\approx \frac{"1"}{{\begin{array}{l} (

\equiv <\omega >) \\ ^{1.000...} \\ \end{array}}}$ \textbf{\textit{Hyperbolicity}} ``noise''