Large negative thermal Hall response in the pseudogap phase of cuprates

ORAL

Abstract

The nature of the pseudogap phase of cuprate superconductors remains a mystery. In that phase, the Fermi surface is transformed even though translational symmetry is not broken [1]. A possible explanation is a spin-liquid-like state with topological order [2].
The thermal Hall conductivity κxy has recently emerged as a powerful probe of insulators with unusual forms of magnetism, such as quantum spin liquids [3] and quantum spin ice [4].
We report extensive measurements of the thermal Hall conductivity κxy in several families of cuprates across a wide range of dopings. We observe a large and negative thermal Hall response at temperatures below the pseudogap temperature T*, which appears immediately below the pseudogap critical doping p*. The negative κxy contrasts with the positive electrical Hall conductivity σxy and, moreover, the magnitude of κxy increases as doping is reduced towards p = 0, whereas σxy vanishes as the material becomes an insulator.
The negative κxy is therefore due to neutral heat carriers and it points to spin chirality [5], or perhaps topological excitations.

[1] Proust & Taillefer, ARCMP; arXiv:1804.08502 (2018).
[2] Scheurer et al., PNAS (2018).
[3] Kasahara et al., Nature (2018).
[4] Hirschberger et al., Science (2015).
[5] Lee et al., PRB (2015).

Presenters

  • Gael Grissonnanche

    University of Sherbrooke (Canada), Physics, Université de Sherbrooke, Universite de Sherbrooke (Canada)

Authors

  • Gael Grissonnanche

    University of Sherbrooke (Canada), Physics, Université de Sherbrooke, Universite de Sherbrooke (Canada)

  • Anaelle Legros

    Université de Sherbrooke, Canada, Physics, Université de Sherbrooke, Universite de Sherbrooke (Canada)

  • Sven Badoux

    Universite de Sherbrooke, Universite de Sherbrooke (Canada)

  • Étienne Lefrancois

    Universite de Sherbrooke (Canada)

  • Victor Zatko

    Universite de Sherbrooke (Canada)

  • Maude le Lizaire

    Universite de Sherbrooke (Canada)

  • Francis Laliberte

    Université de Sherbrooke, Canada, Physics, Université de Sherbrooke, Universite de Sherbrooke (Canada)

  • Adrien Gourgout

    Universite de Sherbrooke, Universite de Sherbrooke (Canada)

  • Jianshi Zhou

    Texas Materials Institute, University of Texas at Austin, University of Texas at Austin, Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas, University of Texas (Austin, USA), Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA

  • Sunseng Pyon

    Department of Advanced Materials, University of Tokyo, Department of Applied Physics, The University of Tokyo, University of Tokyo (Japan)

  • Tomohiro Takayama

    Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research, University of Tokyo (Japan)

  • Hidenori Takagi

    Department of Advanced Materials, University of Tokyo, Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research, Physics, University of Tokyo, University of Tokyo (Japan)

  • Shimpei Ono

    Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (Japan), CRIEPI, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, Japan

  • Nicolas Doiron-Leyraud

    Université de Sherbrooke, Canada, Universite de Sherbrooke, Universite de Sherbrooke (Canada)

  • Louis Taillefer

    University of Sherbrooke (Canada), Université de Sherbrooke, Canada, Physics, Université de Sherbrooke, Universite de Sherbrooke, Universite de Sherbrooke (Canada)