Superconducting Sr2RuO4 thin films with record transition temperature up to 2 K by molecular-beam epitaxy
ORAL
Abstract
Clarifying the superconducting order parameter of Sr2RuO4 has remained an enigma despite more than two decades of research on high-quality Sr2RuO4 single crystals.[1] High-quality Sr2RuO4 thin films with robust superconductivity enable an alternative approach toto clarifying its superconducting through phase-sensitive experiments, as well as fabricating quantum circuits. Unfortunately, the growth of reproducible high-quality superconducting Sr2RuO4 thin films has been limited due to its extreme sensitivity to structural disorder and narrow growth window.[2]
In this work, we grew superconducting Sr2RuO4 thin films on NdGaO3 (110) substrates by molecular-beam epitaxy (MBE) in the adsorption-controlled regime.[2] We characterized the Sr2RuO4 thin films by x-ray diffraction (XRD), atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), and low-temperature transport. Our optimized Sr2RuO4 thin films show a superconducting transition temperature (midpoint) as high as 2.1 K and residual resistivity ratio as 122; both are the best values ever reported. We also clarified that the quality of superconductivity in Sr2RuO4 thin film was highly related to the microstructure measured by STEM.
References
[1] Y. Maeno et al., Nature 372, 532 (1994)
[2] H. P. Nair et al., APL Materials 6, 101108 (2018)
In this work, we grew superconducting Sr2RuO4 thin films on NdGaO3 (110) substrates by molecular-beam epitaxy (MBE) in the adsorption-controlled regime.[2] We characterized the Sr2RuO4 thin films by x-ray diffraction (XRD), atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), and low-temperature transport. Our optimized Sr2RuO4 thin films show a superconducting transition temperature (midpoint) as high as 2.1 K and residual resistivity ratio as 122; both are the best values ever reported. We also clarified that the quality of superconductivity in Sr2RuO4 thin film was highly related to the microstructure measured by STEM.
References
[1] Y. Maeno et al., Nature 372, 532 (1994)
[2] H. P. Nair et al., APL Materials 6, 101108 (2018)
–
Presenters
-
Jinkwon Kim
Cornell University, Seoul National University
Authors
-
Jinkwon Kim
Cornell University, Seoul National University
-
Casey K Kim
Cornell University
-
Jeongkeun Song
Seoul Natl Univ
-
Darrell G Schlom
Cornell University, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Cornell University