Deconfined Quantum Criticality in a Shastry-Sutherland Compound SrCu2(BO3)2
ORAL · Invited
Abstract
In this talk, I will present our 11B nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) studies on SrCu2(BO3)2 with combined high-pressure and high-field tuning, and cooled in a dilution refrigerator, to approach DQCP [7]. At pressures above 2 GPa, we discovered microscopic experimental evidence of a full-plaquette (FP) singlet state, where the FWHM of the spectra behaves as an order parameter below a transition temperature of 1.8 K. Furthermore, at pressures of 2.1 and 2.4 GPa, our NMR spectra reveal a field-induced weakly first-order QPT from the FP state to the AFM state at a field about 6 T, where the coexistence temperature of two phases is as low as 0.07 K and the order parameter of the AFM phase becomes very small at the QPT. Furthermore, both transition temperatures of the PS and the AFM phases scale with |H-HC| when approaching the transition field HC with the same power-law exponent; such duality supports the emergence of enhanced symmetries, consistent with an enhanced O(3) symmetry by numerical simulations. The spin-lattice relaxation rate data 1/T1 at 2.4 GPa also reveals a quantum critical scaling behavior in the low-energy spin dynamics, which does not follow a traditional QCP. Therefore, our study provides concrete experiment evidences for realization of a proximate DQCP and a new platform for exploring DQCP. Note that the system may go beyond the Shastry-Sutherland model; many properties, such as the nature of a plaquette-liquid phase and existence of fractional excitations, call for further experimental studies.
References:
[1] R. R. P. Singh et al., Science 303, 1490 (2004).
[2] A. W. Sandvik, Phys. Rev. Lett 98, 227202 (2007).
[3] H. Kageyama et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 82, 3168 (1999).
[4] M. E. Zayed et al., Nature Phys. 13, 962 (2017).
[5] J. Guo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 124, 206602 (2020).
[6] J. Larrea Jimenez et al., Nature 592, 370 (2021).
[7] Y. Cui et al., Science 380, 1179 (2023).
–
Presenters
-
Weiqiang Yu
Department of Physics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
Authors
-
Weiqiang Yu
Department of Physics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
-
Yi Cui
Renmin Univ of China, Department of Physics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
-
Lu Liu
School of Physics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
-
Huihang Lin
Department of Physics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
-
Kai-Hsin W Wu
Boston University, Department of Physics, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA
-
Wenshan Hong
Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
-
Xuefei Liu
Department of Physics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
-
Cong Li
Department of Physics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
-
Ze Hu
Department of Physics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
-
Yi Cui
Renmin Univ of China, Department of Physics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
-
Shiliang Li
Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
-
Yi Cui
Renmin Univ of China, Department of Physics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
-
Kai-Hsin W Wu
Boston University, Department of Physics, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA