Closed-loop Optimization for high-fidelity Controlled-Z Gates in Superconducting Qubits

ORAL

Abstract

Qubit operations must be highly accurate and fast to fully exploit the potential of quantum computing. Here, we use a superconducting qubit architecture with fixed-frequency qubits and tunable coupling elements. In this architecture, adiabatic coupler-activated controlled-phase gates, in combination with single-qubit gates, promise high-fidelity qubit operation. However, using simple calibration routines limits the control complexity of the two-qubit gates and may lead to uncontrolled leakage or decoherence effects during the gate. We use a closed-loop optimization based on two-qubit randomized benchmarking sequences with adaptive sensitivity. We calibrate and compare various pulse shapes ranging from minimal parameter sets to piecewise-constant pulse shapes with high complexity. We find that the choice of pulse parametrization can elevate the gate fidelity, decrease the gate time, and reduce leakage by exploiting the full system dynamics and accommodating the transfer functions of the cryogenic cabling. Using these techniques, we obtain controlled-Z gate fidelities of up to 99.9%.

* We acknowledge financial support from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research via the funding program quantum technologies - from basic research to the market under contract number 13N15680 "GeQCoS" and under contract number 13N16188 “MUNIQC-SC” as well as by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) via project number FI2549/1-1 and the Germany's Excellence Strategy EXC-2111-390814868 ‘MCQST’. The research is part of the Munich Quantum Valley, which is supported by the Bavarian state government with funds from the Hightech Agenda Bayern Plus.

Presenters

  • Niklas J Glaser

    Walther-Meißner-Institut & TU Munich, TU Munich & Walther-Meissner-Institute

Authors

  • Niklas J Glaser

    Walther-Meißner-Institut & TU Munich, TU Munich & Walther-Meissner-Institute

  • Max Werninghaus

    TU Munich & Walther-Meissner-Institute, Walther-Meißner-Institut & TU Munich, TU Munich & Walther-Meißner-Institut, TU Munich, Walther-Meißner-Institute

  • Federico Roy

    Walther-Meißner-Institut & Saarland University, Walther-Meissner-Institute

  • João Romeiro

    TU Munich & Walther-Meissner-Institute, Walther-Meissner-Institute

  • Ivan Tsitsilin

    TU Munich & Walther-Meissner-Institute, Walther-Meißner-Institut & TU Munich, Walther-Meißner-Institut

  • Leon Koch

    TU Munich & Walther-Meissner-Institute, Walther-Meißner-Institut & TU Munich, TU Munich, TU Munich & Walther-Meißner-Institut, TU Munich & Walther-Meißner-Institute, TU Munich, Walther-Meißner-Institute

  • Niklas Bruckmoser

    TU Munich & Walther-Meissner-Institute, Walther-Meißner-Institut & TU Munich, TU Munich & Walther-Meißner-Institut, Walther-Meissner-Institute, TUM, Walther-Meißner-Institut

  • Johannes Schirk

    TU Munich & Walther-Meissner-Institute, Walther-Meißner-Institut & TU Munich, TU Munich & Walther-Meißner-Institut, Walther-Meissner-Institute

  • Malay Singh

    TU Munich and Walther-Meissner-Institute, Walther-Meißner-Institut & TU Munich, TU Munich & Walther-Meißner-Institut, TU Munich

  • Lasse Södergren

    TU Munich & Walther-Meissner-Institute, TU Munich, Walther-Meißner-Institute

  • Stefan Filipp

    TU Munich & Walther-Meissner-Institute, Walther-Meißner-Institut & TU Munich, TU Munich & Walther-Meißner-Institut, TU Munich & Walther-Meißner-Institute