Study on nematic superconductivity in tetragonal Fe(Se, S) using magnetic torque measurements
ORAL
Abstract
The iron-based superconductor FeSe undergoes a nematic transition at 90 K accompanied by a structural transition from orthorhombic to tetragonal structure. Also, this nematic transition temperature is suppressed as the amount of S-substitutions increases in FeSe1-xSx, and it becomes zero at x = 0.17 (nematic quantum critical point). Recently, in a SC phase outside this nematic phase (x > 0.17), a large residual quasiparticle density of states appears and anomalously suppressed superfluid density has been found in the zero-temperature limit [1-3]. These are the characteristics of theoretically suggested new gap structure for superconductivity with broken time-reversal symmetry, in which the gap closes in two-dimensional planes (Bogoliubov Fermi surfaces, BFSs) [4].
Recent angle-resolved photoemission measurements revealed an extended momentum range with no superconducting gap, consistent with the presence of such BFSs [5]. Surprisingly, the gap structure shows two-fold anisotropy instead of four-fold symmetry of the normal-state Fermi surface in the tetragonal phase of FeSe1-xSx. Here we investigated the rotational symmetry breaking in the superconducting state of tetragonal FeSe1-xSx using magnetic torque measurements. We discuss the possibility of a nematic superconducting state from the obtained results.
Recent angle-resolved photoemission measurements revealed an extended momentum range with no superconducting gap, consistent with the presence of such BFSs [5]. Surprisingly, the gap structure shows two-fold anisotropy instead of four-fold symmetry of the normal-state Fermi surface in the tetragonal phase of FeSe1-xSx. Here we investigated the rotational symmetry breaking in the superconducting state of tetragonal FeSe1-xSx using magnetic torque measurements. We discuss the possibility of a nematic superconducting state from the obtained results.
- [1]Y. Mizukami et al., Commun. Phys. 6, 183 (2023)
[2]T. Hanaguri et al., Sci. Adv. 4, eaar6419 (2018).
[3]K. Matsuura et al., PNAS 120, e2208276120 (2023).
[4]C. Setty et al., Nat. Commun. 11, 523 (2020).
[5]T. Nagashima et al., https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2224728/v1 (2022).
–
Presenters
-
Kohei Matsuura
Dept. of Adv. Mater. Sci., Univ. of Tokyo, The University of Tokyo, University of Tokyo
Authors
-
Kohei Matsuura
Dept. of Adv. Mater. Sci., Univ. of Tokyo, The University of Tokyo, University of Tokyo
-
Kota Ishihara
Univ of Tokyo, Dept. of Adv. Mater. Sci., Univ. of Tokyo, University of Tokyo
-
Kohei Matsuura
Dept. of Appl. Phys., Univ. of Tokyo
-
Supeng Liu
Dept. of Adv. Mater. Sci., Univ. of Tokyo
-
Yuta Mizukami
Dep. of Phys., Tohoku Univ., Tohoku University
-
Kenichiro Hashimoto
The University of Tokyo, Dept. of Adv. Mater. Sci., Univ. of Tokyo, U. Tokyo, Univ. of Tokyo, University of Tokyo
-
Takasada Shibauchi
University of Tokyo, Dept. of Adv. Mater. Sci., Univ. of Tokyo