Thermodynamic transitions and topological properties of spin-triplet superconductors: application to UTe2
ORAL
Abstract
The discovery of unconventional superconductivity in the heavy-fermion material UTe2 has reinvigorated research of spin-triplet superconductivity. We perform a theoretical study of coupled two-component spin-triplet superconducting order parameters and their thermodynamic transitions into the superconducting state. With focus on the behavior of the temperature dependence of the specific heat capacity, we find that two-component time-reversal symmetry breaking superconducting order may feature vanishing or even negative secondary specific heat anomalies. The origin of this unusual specific heat behavior is tied to the non-unitarity of the composite order parameter. Additionally, we supply an analysis of the topological surface states associated with the different possible spin-triplet orders. The single- and two-component orders carry distinctive anomalous boundary excitations associated to their bulk topology. Depending on the order, we identify second-order topological nodal superconducting phases hosting anomalous surface and hinge states together with the bulk nodes, a Weyl superconducting phase hosting Fermi arcs of Bogoliubov quasiparticles, as well as fully gapped first- and second-order topological phases hosting Majorana Dirac surface states and chiral Majorana hinge modes, respectively.
*H.S.R. was supported by research Grant No. 40509 from VILLUM FONDEN. A.K. acknowledges support by the Danish National Committee for Research Infrastructure (NUFI) through the ESS-Lighthouse Q-MAT. M.G. acknowledges support by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 856526, and from the Danish National Research Foundation, the Danish Council for Independent Research | Natural Sciences.
–
Presenters
Andreas Kreisel
Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Niels Bohr Insititute, U. Copenhagen
Authors
Henrik S Røising
Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
Andreas Kreisel
Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Niels Bohr Insititute, U. Copenhagen
Max Geier
Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen