Student Understanding of Energy Concepts Across Disciplinary Boundaries

POSTER

Abstract

In most undergraduate curricula, students are expected to have the ability to apply, or transfer, a learned concept to new coursework. In the sciences, students are often introduced to energy ideas with discipline-specific vocabulary and tasks which encourage compartmentalized, surface-level understandings of energy concepts. Our research investigates student transfer of energy ideas within a coherent science course series, where physics is the foundational course. Similar modeling tools and vocabulary are used in the classes to help students see energy as a unifying framework. We seek to identify and describe what transfer “looks like” in this idealized context by interviewing students enrolled in the next three science courses in the series. They are asked to describe and explain scientific phenomena they have not yet encountered, but to which it is possible to apply energy concepts from the prerequisite physics course. Our qualitative analysis focuses on the identification of the energy concepts students utilize during their reasoning process. We aim to better understand the resources students activate and the obstacles they encounter when attempting this transfer.

Authors

  • Jessica Trottier

    Western Washington University

  • D. Niroomand

    Gonzaga University, Wabash College, Simon Fraser University, Tel Aviv University, University of Manitoba, Texas A&M University, TRIUMF, University of British Columbia, Caltech, Western Washington University, University of Washington, Whatcom Community College, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Siena College, University of Idaho, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Idaho, Boise State University

  • D. Niroomand

    Gonzaga University, Wabash College, Simon Fraser University, Tel Aviv University, University of Manitoba, Texas A&M University, TRIUMF, University of British Columbia, Caltech, Western Washington University, University of Washington, Whatcom Community College, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Siena College, University of Idaho, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Idaho, Boise State University

  • D. Niroomand

    Gonzaga University, Wabash College, Simon Fraser University, Tel Aviv University, University of Manitoba, Texas A&M University, TRIUMF, University of British Columbia, Caltech, Western Washington University, University of Washington, Whatcom Community College, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Siena College, University of Idaho, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Idaho, Boise State University

  • D. Niroomand

    Gonzaga University, Wabash College, Simon Fraser University, Tel Aviv University, University of Manitoba, Texas A&M University, TRIUMF, University of British Columbia, Caltech, Western Washington University, University of Washington, Whatcom Community College, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Siena College, University of Idaho, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Idaho, Boise State University

  • D. Niroomand

    Gonzaga University, Wabash College, Simon Fraser University, Tel Aviv University, University of Manitoba, Texas A&M University, TRIUMF, University of British Columbia, Caltech, Western Washington University, University of Washington, Whatcom Community College, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Siena College, University of Idaho, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Idaho, Boise State University

  • D. Niroomand

    Gonzaga University, Wabash College, Simon Fraser University, Tel Aviv University, University of Manitoba, Texas A&M University, TRIUMF, University of British Columbia, Caltech, Western Washington University, University of Washington, Whatcom Community College, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Siena College, University of Idaho, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Idaho, Boise State University