Monitoring the uniformity of alpha helices in lipophilic environments

POSTER

Abstract

It is known that membrane-embedded alpha helices are more uniform structurally than their aqueous counterparts. Despite this uniformity, protein dynamics are thought to be common in these proteins in order for them to conduct their cellular tasks. However, how amino acid sequence facilitates these dynamics remains unknown as methods for investigating structural heterogeneity in transmembrane proteins are limited. Circular dichroism (CD) is often used to characterize the secondary structure of the protein, but its sensitivity to specific non-helical structural configurations is low. Deep-ultraviolet resonance Raman spectroscopy (DUVRR) is a structurally sensitive spectroscopy technique emerging for analyzing membrane protein structures. A set of \textit{de novo} designed peptides have been constructed that contain varying contents of helix breaking residues (HBR) in order to test their role helical instability in lipophilic environments. The secondary structure of each peptide was monitored through the measured by DUVRR spectroscopy, where changes in the Amide III and S modes indicate that HBRs actually cause the ``unwinding'' or the helix when solubilized in detergent environments. This observation has implications towards the role of water presentation in membrane protein dynamics.

Authors

  • Anahita Zare

    University of Missouri

  • Mark Neubauer

    University of Missouri-Columbia, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Indiana University, Purdue University, Argonne National Laboratory, University of Missouri, College of Physics Science, Qingda University, Qingdao, 266071, China, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Iowa State University, Technical University of Denmark, University of Missouri - Columbia, University of California - San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, Department of Physics, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri 65211, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri-Columbia, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, Department of Physics and Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3290, Univ of Missouri - Columbia, Duke University, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Ames Laboratory, U.S. DOE, Texas Center of Superconductivity and the Department of Physics, University of Houston, Institute of Physics, Siberian Division, Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasnoyarsk, 66036, Russia, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, NIST Center for Neutron Research, MU Research Reactor, Ames Laboratory and Dep. of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, AmesAmes Laboratory and Dep. of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, HFIR, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

  • Mark Neubauer

    University of Missouri-Columbia, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Indiana University, Purdue University, Argonne National Laboratory, University of Missouri, College of Physics Science, Qingda University, Qingdao, 266071, China, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Iowa State University, Technical University of Denmark, University of Missouri - Columbia, University of California - San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, Department of Physics, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri 65211, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri-Columbia, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, Department of Physics and Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3290, Univ of Missouri - Columbia, Duke University, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Ames Laboratory, U.S. DOE, Texas Center of Superconductivity and the Department of Physics, University of Houston, Institute of Physics, Siberian Division, Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasnoyarsk, 66036, Russia, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, NIST Center for Neutron Research, MU Research Reactor, Ames Laboratory and Dep. of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, AmesAmes Laboratory and Dep. of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, HFIR, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

  • Mark Neubauer

    University of Missouri-Columbia, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Indiana University, Purdue University, Argonne National Laboratory, University of Missouri, College of Physics Science, Qingda University, Qingdao, 266071, China, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Iowa State University, Technical University of Denmark, University of Missouri - Columbia, University of California - San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, Department of Physics, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri 65211, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri-Columbia, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, Department of Physics and Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3290, Univ of Missouri - Columbia, Duke University, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Ames Laboratory, U.S. DOE, Texas Center of Superconductivity and the Department of Physics, University of Houston, Institute of Physics, Siberian Division, Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasnoyarsk, 66036, Russia, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, NIST Center for Neutron Research, MU Research Reactor, Ames Laboratory and Dep. of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, AmesAmes Laboratory and Dep. of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, HFIR, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign