Semiotic Resources and their Relationship in Physics and broadly in STEM Problem-solving.

POSTER

Abstract

Physics is a major component of engineering principles and is a helpful field to better understand the physical world. Typically, effective problem solving of physics questions, such as with circuit analysis, requires a combination of pre-existing knowledge and semiotic resources (essential tools for meaning-making such as diagrams, symbols, gestures, or other components involved in the problem-solving process); however, the way students engage with semiotic resources is complex and requires more study. In researching how students engage with, or fail to engage with, multiple semiotic resources in a problem-solving scenario, we are able to determine how to aid students in utilizing these resources and develop their understanding of more complex physics concepts and mathematics. Data is obtained through the investigation of a class of Introductory Studio Physics students and how they tackle problems related to Kirchhoff’s Circuit Laws. Students were handed problem sheets and asked to verbally walk interviewers through each step of their respective problem-solving process, while their work was filmed from above via a tripod-cellphone setup. This was then collected into a moment-by-moment analysis of students’ problem solving to determine which semiotic resources are used, how students translate between them, and how effective semiotic frameworks are built up and utilized for circuit analysis.

Publication: 1. Maries, A., & Singh, C. (2012, August 1-2). To use or not to use diagrams: The effect of drawing a diagram in solving introductory physics problems. Paper presented at Physics Education Research Conference 2012, Philadelphia, PA. Retrieved May 14, 2022, from https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=12834&DocID=3367
2. Weliweriya, N. (1970, January 1). Investigating students' use of mathematical tools and representations in undergraduate physics problem-solving. K. Retrieved January 3, 2022, from https://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/handle/2097/40079
3. Airey, J. (2015). Social Semiotics in Higher Education: Examples from teaching and learning in undergraduate physics. SACF Singapore-Sweden Excellence Seminars, 103. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-266049
4. Fredlund, T. (2015). Using a Social Semiotic Perspective to Inform the Teaching and Learning of Physics (PhD dissertation). Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-247771
5. Métioui, Abdeljalil. (2012). THE PERSISTENCE OF STUDENTS' UNFOUNDED BELIEFS ABOUT ELECTRICAL CIRCUITS: THE CASE OF KIRCHHOFF'S LAWS.
6. Volkwyn, T. S., Airey, J., Gregorcic, B., & Heijkenskjöld, F. (2019). Transduction and Science Learning: Multimodality in the Physics Laboratory. Designs for Learning, 11(1), 16–29. DOI: http://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.118

Presenters

  • Chaudhry N Rasool

    University of Georgia

Authors

  • Chaudhry N Rasool

    University of Georgia

  • Nandana J Weliweriya

    University of Georgia