Can an experimental fact be accepted if it contradicts a firm belief?

ORAL

Abstract

In Physics, there is an absurd situation now. On the one hand the Theories of Relativity (TRs) have been proven by many experiments, and finally by the spectacular verification of the forecasted gravitational waves. Therefore, they must be right. But on the other hand, there is an experimental fact that reveals that Einsteins ingenious space-time idea is wrong. What now?

The analysis of the crazy patterns of the return rates of photons coming from a mirror on the Moon, that have been published by the team of lunar laser ranging project, shows with an error probability of < 10-80 that the photons appear there, where the Earth was 2.55 s ago, and very rarely in the detector next to the laser. These patterns occur due to a superposition of the displacements by all velocities of the Earth in the Universe, including the unknown velocity of the Great Attractor, that can be determined by this method. With other words: if a laser in a moving frame sends a pulse to a detector perpendicular to the moving direction or via a 45° mirror, this pulse will arrive behind the detector if the distance or/and the velocity are great enough. The light path is always perpendicular to the moving direction and not oblique. But Einstein derived the time dilation by the Pythagoras from an oblique light path, and that is wrong. The length contradiction, proposed by H.A. Lorentz, would destroy the null result of the Michelson Morley experiment. The geometric interpretation of the time dilation is therefore wrong.

But nobody wants it to be true, though the TRs have now the same quality as the Epicycle Theory. Physics should be based on experimental facts and not on deep believe in a theory. If this is ignored the research for controlling gravity will be prevented or delayed. Control of gravity cannot be achieved by the space-time gravitation.

I would like to present this ppt-presentation where I propose an alternative idea, also based on experimental facts:

https://www.srcscholarsmedia.com/video-article/experimental-facts-why-the-theories-of-relativity-are-wrong-though-they-are-right-57.html

*ok, this is up to you

Publication: DOI: 10.37421/2090-0902.2023.14.442
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47363/JPMA/2023(1)101
https://www.srcscholarsmedia.com/video-article/experimental-facts-why-the-theories-of-relativity-are-wrong-though-they-are-right-57.html

Presenters

  • Hans Deyssenroth

    • American Association For The Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Authors

  • Hans Deyssenroth

    • American Association For The Advancement of Science (AAAS)