Remote epitaxial frustration

ORAL

Abstract

Remote epitaxy promises to relax the lattice and chemical mismatch challenges of conventional epitaxy, to enable low defect density and chemically abrupt heterostructures and etch-free synthesis of single crystalline membranes. However, smoking gun experimental evidence for a true remote mechanisms remains elusive because most observations can be explained by alternative mechanisms which are often macroscopically indistinguishable from remote epitaxy [1]. Here, using GdAuGe films grown on graphene/SiC (0001), we present two long-range signatures of a remote mechanism that cannot be explained by the leading alternatives: (1) a two atomic layer thick frustrated interlayer at the GdAuGe/graphene interface and (2) a 30 degree rotated epitaxial relationship between GdAuGe film and SiC substrate. First principles and analytical theory [2] suggest these signatures arise from remote epitaxial frustration, i.e. a competition among epitaxy of GdAuGe to the remotely screened substrate, to graphene, and to the graphene/SiC interface reconstruction. Our results highlight the importance of considering the multiple contributions to the total lattice potential above graphene-covered surfaces [3]. Moreover, our work demonstrates that tuning the relative amplitudes and frequencies of these potentials provides opportunities to push beyond the current epitaxial paradigm, in which the film mimics the structure of the substrate. Rather, remote frustration enables the intentional disruption of long-range translational order, towards stabilizing new interfacial glasses and quasicrystals, and the direct synthesis of twisted Moire superstructures.

*This work was primarily supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, under Award No. DE-SC0023958 (T J, A S, and J K K). Z L and Q T C were supported by the Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program at Sandia National Laboratories under project 233271. J K K and Z L acknowledge preliminary support from the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-21-0127). JAR and CD acknowledge support from NSF-MRSEC through DMR2011839 and the NSF-MIP 2D Crystal Consortium (2DCC-MIP) via DMR-2039351.

Publication: [1] S. Manzo, et. al. Nature Communications 13, 4014, (2022).
[2] J. K. Kawasaki and Q. Campbell. arXiv:2507.09913 (2025).
[3] Z. LaDuca, et. al. 2D Materials 12 043006 (2025).

Presenters

  • Jason Kawasaki

    • University of Wisconsin - Madison

Authors

  • Taehwan Jung

    • University of Wisconsin - Madison
  • Nicholas L Hagopian

    • University of Wisconsin Madison
    • University of Wisconsin - Madison
  • Anshu Sirohi

    • University of Wisconsin Madison
  • Quinn Campbell

    • Sandia National Laboratories
  • Zachary Thomas LaDuca

    • University of Wisconsin - Madison
  • Tamalika Samanta

    • University of Wisconsin - Madison
  • Chengye Dong

    • Pennsylvania State University
  • Joshua A Robinson

    • Pennsylvania State University
  • Paul Voyles

    • University of Wisconsin-Madison
    • University of Wisconsin Madison
    • University of Wisconsin - Madison
  • Jason Kawasaki

    • University of Wisconsin - Madison