Optimized Weight-4 Superconducting Qubit Chip Design Workflow

POSTER

Abstract

Since the introduction of the transmon in 2007, many advances have been made in quality and scaling of superconducting qubits. This includes design tools such as Qiskit Metal and related codebases, as well as theoretical frameworks for modelling the transmon hamiltonian in a superconducting circuit and thus predicting physical properties of the resulting chip, such as coherence time, dispersive shift, transition frequency, charging energy, coupling strength, etc.



It is possible to combine these in a comprehensive workflow, detailing the process from the simplest qubit graph all the way to a physical layout for fabrication, and further describing an iterative feedback loop using empirical results to inform design choices and enable higher performance devices. Here we present the workflow as applied to a weight-4 floating transmon device, allowing the reader to understand and perform each step. We discuss the interplay of all relevant equations and constraints underway and provide experimental verification of the process, while demonstrating the potential of a data-driven feedback loop, as well as provide selected examples of programmatic automation to make processes more efficient and, importantly, more consistent. The workflow can easily be applied to qubit graphs that are larger or otherwise different from the weight-4 circuit.

*This work is funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation grant number NNF22SA0081175.

Publication: Paper tentatively titled 'Optimized Weight-4 Superconducting Qubit Chip Design Workflow'

Presenters

  • Thue Christian Thann Nikolajsen

    • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen

Authors

  • Thue Christian Thann Nikolajsen

    • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
  • Josu Gomez Beldarrain

    • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
  • David F Feldstein-Bofill

    • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
  • Asbjørn Drachmann

    • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
    • Neils Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
  • Daniel S Dragheim Kjær

    • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
  • Kasper Grove-Rasmussen

    • University of Copenhagen
  • Jacob Hastrup

    • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
  • Philip Holm

    • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
  • Benjamin Joecker

    • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
  • Sangeeth Kallatt

    • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
  • Morten Kjaergaard

    • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
  • Pei Liu

    • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
  • Albert Malmros

    • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
  • Malthe A Marciniak

    • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
  • Elvedin Memisevic

    • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
  • Smitha Nair

    • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
  • Clinton A. Potts

    • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
  • Ksenia Shagalov

    • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
  • Zhenhai Sun

    • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
  • Mark K Svendsen

    • Niels Bohr Institute
    • NNF Quantum Computing Programme, Niels Bohr Institute
    • Niels Bohr Institute of Physics
    • NBI
    • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
  • Christopher W Warren

    • Niels Bohr Institute
    • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
  • James L Webb

    • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
  • Malte Wettergren Andreasen

    • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
  • Peter Krogstrup

    • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
    • Niels Bohr Institute of Physics