(t, i, f)-Physical Laws and (t, i, f)-Physical Constants

In our reality, we do not have perfect spaces and perfect systems. Therefore many \textit{physical laws} function approximatively. Also, the \textit{physical constants} are not universal too. Variations of their values depend from a space to another, from a system to another, from a time to another, and so on depending on many parameters. The physical laws and similarly the physical constants are t{\%} true, i{\%} indeterminate, and f{\%} false in a given space with a certain composition, and it has a different neutrosophical truth value \textless t', i', f'\textgreater in another space with another composition. That's why, instead of universal (1, 0, 0)-physical laws and universal (1, 0, 0)-physical constants, we have (t, i, f)-physical laws and respectively (t, i, f)-physical constants, meaning partially true, partially indeterminate, and partially false in each space. Therefore, one uses the \textit{neutrosophic logic}, which is a general framework for unification of many existing logics, and its components t (truth), i (indeterminacy), f (falsehood) are standard or non-standard real subsets of ]$^{\mathrm{-}}$0, 1$^{\mathrm{+}}$[ with not necessarily any connection between them. It has many applications in physics. Reference: Florentin Smarandache, \textit{Introduction to Neutrosophic Measure, Neutrosophic Integral, and Neutrosophic Probability}, by Sitech {\&} Educational, Craiova, 140 p., 2013.